TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/SPM

SPM

Reported on 53 benchmarks across 6 tasks · 2 papers · 14 SOTA

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Computer Vision26 results

  • Source-Free Domain AdaptationonPACS
    Average Accuracy· 2025-05-30
    86.7
    SOTA
    Shuffle PatchMix Augmentation with Confidence-Margin Weighted Pseudo-Labels for Enhanced Source-Free Domain AdaptationarXiv:2505.24216
  • Pose EstimationonOCHuman
    AP50· 2019-08-24
    67.5
    best: 89.7 (MIPNet (gt-bb))
    SOTA
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Pose EstimationonOCHuman
    AP75· 2019-08-24
    53.2
    best: 80.1 (MIPNet (gt-bb))
    SOTA
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Pose EstimationonOCHuman
    Validation AP· 2019-08-24
    47.6
    best: 92.8 (ViTPose (ViTAE-G, GT bounding boxes))
    SOTA
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Multi-Person Pose EstimationonOCHuman
    AP50· 2019-08-24
    67.5
    best: 89.7 (MIPNet (gt-bb))
    SOTA
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Multi-Person Pose EstimationonOCHuman
    AP75· 2019-08-24
    53.2
    best: 80.1 (MIPNet (gt-bb))
    SOTA
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Multi-Person Pose EstimationonOCHuman
    Validation AP· 2019-08-24
    47.6
    best: 74.1 (MIPNet (gt-bb))
    SOTA
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Source-Free Domain AdaptationonVisDA-2017
    Accuracy· 2025-05-30
    89.4
    best: 93.2 (RCL)
    Shuffle PatchMix Augmentation with Confidence-Margin Weighted Pseudo-Labels for Enhanced Source-Free Domain AdaptationarXiv:2505.24216
  • Pose EstimationonCOCO test-dev
    AP· 2019-08-24
    66.9
    best: 81.1 (ViTPose (ViTAE-G, ensemble))
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Pose EstimationonCOCO test-dev
    AP50· 2019-08-24
    88.5
    best: 95 (ViTPose (ViTAE-G, ensemble))
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Pose EstimationonCOCO test-dev
    AP75· 2019-08-24
    72.9
    best: 88.2 (ViTPose (ViTAE-G, ensemble))
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Pose EstimationonCOCO test-dev
    APL· 2019-08-24
    73.1
    best: 86.5 (PoseBH-H)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Pose EstimationonCOCO test-dev
    APM· 2019-08-24
    62.6
    best: 83.8 (4xRSN-50 (ensemble))
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Pose EstimationonCrowdPose
    AP Easy· 2019-08-24
    70.3
    best: 88.8 (RTMO-l)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Pose EstimationonCrowdPose
    AP Hard· 2019-08-24
    55.7
    best: 466 (DETRPose-N)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Pose EstimationonCrowdPose
    AP Medium· 2019-08-24
    64.5
    best: 566 (DETRPose-N)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Pose EstimationonCrowdPose
    mAP @0.5:0.95· 2019-08-24
    63.7
    best: 83.8 (RTMO-l)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Multi-Person Pose EstimationonCOCO test-dev
    AP· 2019-08-24
    66.9
    best: 79.2 (SCIO (HRNet-48))
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Multi-Person Pose EstimationonCOCO test-dev
    AP50· 2019-08-24
    88.5
    best: 93.5 (SCIO (HRNet-48))
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Multi-Person Pose EstimationonCOCO test-dev
    AP75· 2019-08-24
    72.9
    best: 85.8 (SCIO (HRNet-48))
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Multi-Person Pose EstimationonCOCO test-dev
    APL· 2019-08-24
    73.1
    best: 84.2 (SCIO (HRNet-48))
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Multi-Person Pose EstimationonCOCO test-dev
    APM· 2019-08-24
    62.6
    best: 74.1 (SCIO (HRNet-48))
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Multi-Person Pose EstimationonCrowdPose
    AP Easy· 2019-08-24
    70.3
    best: 88.8 (RTMO-l)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Multi-Person Pose EstimationonCrowdPose
    AP Hard· 2019-08-24
    55.7
    best: 466 (DETRPose-N)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Multi-Person Pose EstimationonCrowdPose
    AP Medium· 2019-08-24
    64.5
    best: 566 (DETRPose-N)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Multi-Person Pose EstimationonCrowdPose
    mAP @0.5:0.95· 2019-08-24
    63.7
    best: 83.8 (RTMO-l)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220

Methodology15 results

  • Domain AdaptationonDomainNet
    Accuracy· 2025-05-30
    71.1
    SOTA
    Shuffle PatchMix Augmentation with Confidence-Margin Weighted Pseudo-Labels for Enhanced Source-Free Domain AdaptationarXiv:2505.24216
  • 3DonOCHuman
    AP50· 2019-08-24
    67.5
    best: 89.7 (MIPNet (gt-bb))
    SOTA
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 3DonOCHuman
    AP75· 2019-08-24
    53.2
    best: 80.1 (MIPNet (gt-bb))
    SOTA
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 3DonOCHuman
    Validation AP· 2019-08-24
    47.6
    best: 92.8 (ViTPose (ViTAE-G, GT bounding boxes))
    SOTA
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • Domain AdaptationonPACS
    Average Accuracy· 2025-05-30
    86.7
    best: 99 (SIMPLE+)
    Shuffle PatchMix Augmentation with Confidence-Margin Weighted Pseudo-Labels for Enhanced Source-Free Domain AdaptationarXiv:2505.24216
  • Domain AdaptationonVisDA-2017
    Accuracy· 2025-05-30
    89.4
    best: 93.2 (RCL)
    Shuffle PatchMix Augmentation with Confidence-Margin Weighted Pseudo-Labels for Enhanced Source-Free Domain AdaptationarXiv:2505.24216
  • 3DonCOCO test-dev
    AP· 2019-08-24
    66.9
    best: 81.1 (ViTPose (ViTAE-G, ensemble))
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 3DonCOCO test-dev
    AP50· 2019-08-24
    88.5
    best: 95 (ViTPose (ViTAE-G, ensemble))
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 3DonCOCO test-dev
    AP75· 2019-08-24
    72.9
    best: 88.2 (ViTPose (ViTAE-G, ensemble))
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 3DonCOCO test-dev
    APL· 2019-08-24
    73.1
    best: 86.5 (PoseBH-H)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 3DonCOCO test-dev
    APM· 2019-08-24
    62.6
    best: 83.8 (4xRSN-50 (ensemble))
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 3DonCrowdPose
    AP Easy· 2019-08-24
    70.3
    best: 88.8 (RTMO-l)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 3DonCrowdPose
    AP Hard· 2019-08-24
    55.7
    best: 466 (DETRPose-N)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 3DonCrowdPose
    AP Medium· 2019-08-24
    64.5
    best: 566 (DETRPose-N)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 3DonCrowdPose
    mAP @0.5:0.95· 2019-08-24
    63.7
    best: 83.8 (RTMO-l)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220

Audio12 results

  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionOCHuman
    AP50· 2019-08-24
    67.5
    best: 89.7 (MIPNet (gt-bb))
    SOTA
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionOCHuman
    AP75· 2019-08-24
    53.2
    best: 80.1 (MIPNet (gt-bb))
    SOTA
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionOCHuman
    Validation AP· 2019-08-24
    47.6
    best: 92.8 (ViTPose (ViTAE-G, GT bounding boxes))
    SOTA
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionCOCO test-dev
    AP· 2019-08-24
    66.9
    best: 81.1 (ViTPose (ViTAE-G, ensemble))
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionCOCO test-dev
    AP50· 2019-08-24
    88.5
    best: 95 (ViTPose (ViTAE-G, ensemble))
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionCOCO test-dev
    AP75· 2019-08-24
    72.9
    best: 88.2 (ViTPose (ViTAE-G, ensemble))
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionCOCO test-dev
    APL· 2019-08-24
    73.1
    best: 86.5 (PoseBH-H)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionCOCO test-dev
    APM· 2019-08-24
    62.6
    best: 83.8 (4xRSN-50 (ensemble))
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionCrowdPose
    AP Easy· 2019-08-24
    70.3
    best: 88.8 (RTMO-l)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionCrowdPose
    AP Hard· 2019-08-24
    55.7
    best: 466 (DETRPose-N)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionCrowdPose
    AP Medium· 2019-08-24
    64.5
    best: 566 (DETRPose-N)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220
  • 1 Image, 2*2 StitchionCrowdPose
    mAP @0.5:0.95· 2019-08-24
    63.7
    best: 83.8 (RTMO-l)
    Single-Stage Multi-Person Pose MachinesarXiv:1908.09220