TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/CurveLane-NAS: Unifying Lane-Sensitive Architecture Search...

CurveLane-NAS: Unifying Lane-Sensitive Architecture Search and Adaptive Point Blending

Hang Xu, Shaoju Wang, Xinyue Cai, Wei zhang, Xiaodan Liang, Zhenguo Li

2020-07-23ECCV 2020 8Autonomous DrivingLane Detection
PaperPDFCode

Abstract

We address the curve lane detection problem which poses more realistic challenges than conventional lane detection for better facilitating modern assisted/autonomous driving systems. Current hand-designed lane detection methods are not robust enough to capture the curve lanes especially the remote parts due to the lack of modeling both long-range contextual information and detailed curve trajectory. In this paper, we propose a novel lane-sensitive architecture search framework named CurveLane-NAS to automatically capture both long-ranged coherent and accurate short-range curve information while unifying both architecture search and post-processing on curve lane predictions via point blending. It consists of three search modules: a) a feature fusion search module to find a better fusion of the local and global context for multi-level hierarchy features; b) an elastic backbone search module to explore an efficient feature extractor with good semantics and latency; c) an adaptive point blending module to search a multi-level post-processing refinement strategy to combine multi-scale head prediction. The unified framework ensures lane-sensitive predictions by the mutual guidance between NAS and adaptive point blending. Furthermore, we also steer forward to release a more challenging benchmark named CurveLanes for addressing the most difficult curve lanes. It consists of 150K images with 680K labels.The new dataset can be downloaded at github.com/xbjxh/CurveLanes (already anonymized for this submission). Experiments on the new CurveLanes show that the SOTA lane detection methods suffer substantial performance drop while our model can still reach an 80+% F1-score. Extensive experiments on traditional lane benchmarks such as CULane also demonstrate the superiority of our CurveLane-NAS, e.g. achieving a new SOTA 74.8% F1-score on CULane.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesF1 score82.29CurveLane-L
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesGFLOPs20.7CurveLane-L
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesPrecision91.11CurveLane-L
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesRecall75.03CurveLane-L
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesF1 score81.8CurveLane-M
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesGFLOPs11.6CurveLane-M
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesPrecision93.49CurveLane-M
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesRecall72.71CurveLane-M
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesF1 score81.12CurveLane-S
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesGFLOPs7.4CurveLane-S
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesPrecision93.58CurveLane-S
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesRecall71.59CurveLane-S
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesF1 score78.47PointLaneNet
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesGFLOPs14.8PointLaneNet
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesPrecision86.33PointLaneNet
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesRecall72.91PointLaneNet
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesF1 score65.02SCNN
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesGFLOPs328.4SCNN
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesPrecision76.13SCNN
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesRecall56.74SCNN
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesF1 score50.31Enet-SAD
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesGFLOPs3.9Enet-SAD
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesPrecision63.6Enet-SAD
Autonomous VehiclesCurveLanesRecall41.6Enet-SAD
Autonomous VehiclesCULaneF1 score74.8CurveLane-L
Autonomous VehiclesCULaneF1 score73.5CurveLane-M
Autonomous VehiclesCULaneF1 score71.4CurveLane-S
Lane DetectionCurveLanesF1 score82.29CurveLane-L
Lane DetectionCurveLanesGFLOPs20.7CurveLane-L
Lane DetectionCurveLanesPrecision91.11CurveLane-L
Lane DetectionCurveLanesRecall75.03CurveLane-L
Lane DetectionCurveLanesF1 score81.8CurveLane-M
Lane DetectionCurveLanesGFLOPs11.6CurveLane-M
Lane DetectionCurveLanesPrecision93.49CurveLane-M
Lane DetectionCurveLanesRecall72.71CurveLane-M
Lane DetectionCurveLanesF1 score81.12CurveLane-S
Lane DetectionCurveLanesGFLOPs7.4CurveLane-S
Lane DetectionCurveLanesPrecision93.58CurveLane-S
Lane DetectionCurveLanesRecall71.59CurveLane-S
Lane DetectionCurveLanesF1 score78.47PointLaneNet
Lane DetectionCurveLanesGFLOPs14.8PointLaneNet
Lane DetectionCurveLanesPrecision86.33PointLaneNet
Lane DetectionCurveLanesRecall72.91PointLaneNet
Lane DetectionCurveLanesF1 score65.02SCNN
Lane DetectionCurveLanesGFLOPs328.4SCNN
Lane DetectionCurveLanesPrecision76.13SCNN
Lane DetectionCurveLanesRecall56.74SCNN
Lane DetectionCurveLanesF1 score50.31Enet-SAD
Lane DetectionCurveLanesGFLOPs3.9Enet-SAD
Lane DetectionCurveLanesPrecision63.6Enet-SAD
Lane DetectionCurveLanesRecall41.6Enet-SAD
Lane DetectionCULaneF1 score74.8CurveLane-L
Lane DetectionCULaneF1 score73.5CurveLane-M
Lane DetectionCULaneF1 score71.4CurveLane-S

Related Papers

GEMINUS: Dual-aware Global and Scene-Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts for End-to-End Autonomous Driving2025-07-19AGENTS-LLM: Augmentative GENeration of Challenging Traffic Scenarios with an Agentic LLM Framework2025-07-18World Model-Based End-to-End Scene Generation for Accident Anticipation in Autonomous Driving2025-07-17Orbis: Overcoming Challenges of Long-Horizon Prediction in Driving World Models2025-07-17Channel-wise Motion Features for Efficient Motion Segmentation2025-07-17LaViPlan : Language-Guided Visual Path Planning with RLVR2025-07-17Safeguarding Federated Learning-based Road Condition Classification2025-07-16Towards Autonomous Riding: A Review of Perception, Planning, and Control in Intelligent Two-Wheelers2025-07-16