Tasks
SotA
Datasets
Papers
Methods
Submit
About
SotA
/
Medical
/
Document Text Classification
/
CIFAR-10N-Random3
Document Text Classification on CIFAR-10N-Random3
Metric: Accuracy (mean) (higher is better)
Leaderboard
Dataset
Loading chart...
Results
Submit a result
Export CSV
Sort:
Accuracy (mean) (best first)
Accuracy (mean) (worst first)
Date (newest first)
Date (oldest first)
Model name (A→Z)
#
Model
↕
Accuracy (mean)
▼
Extra Data
Paper
Date
↕
Code
1
PSSCL
96.49
No
-
-
Code
2
SOP+
95.39
No
Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parame...
2022-02-28
Code
3
ILL
95.13
No
Imprecise Label Learning: A Unified Framework fo...
2023-05-22
Code
4
CORES*
94.74
No
Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A ...
2020-10-05
Code
5
ELR+
94.34
No
Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorizat...
2020-06-30
Code
6
GNL
91.83
No
Partial Label Supervision for Agnostic Generativ...
2023-08-02
Code
7
ELR
91.41
No
Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorizat...
2020-06-30
Code
8
CAL
90.74
No
Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Point...
2021-02-10
Code
9
Co-Teaching
90.15
No
Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Netw...
2018-04-18
Code
10
Negative-LS
90.13
No
To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noi...
2021-06-08
Code
11
JoCoR
90.11
No
Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint tra...
2020-03-05
Code
12
Divide-Mix
89.97
No
DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-su...
2020-02-18
Code
13
Positive-LS
89.82
No
Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?
2020-03-05
-
14
CORES
89.79
No
Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A ...
2020-10-05
Code
15
F-div
89.55
No
When Optimizing $f$-divergence is Robust with La...
2020-11-07
Code
16
Co-Teaching+
89.54
No
How does Disagreement Help Generalization agains...
2019-01-14
Code
17
Peer Loss
88.57
No
Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels ...
2019-10-08
Code
18
VolMinNet
88.19
No
Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without...
2021-02-04
Code
19
T-Revision
87.79
No
Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-...
2019-06-01
Code
20
GCE
87.58
No
Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep...
2018-05-20
Code
21
Forward-T
87.04
No
Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Nois...
2016-09-13
Code
22
Backward-T
86.86
No
Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Nois...
2016-09-13
Code
23
CE
85.16
No
-
-
-
#1
PSSCL
96.49
Accuracy (mean)
No paper
Code
#2
SOP+
SOTA
95.39
Accuracy (mean)
· 2022-02-28
Robust Training under Label Noise by Over-parameterization
Code
#3
ILL
95.13
Accuracy (mean)
· 2023-05-22
Imprecise Label Learning: A Unified Framework for Learning with Various Imprecise Label Configurations
Code
#4
CORES*
SOTA
94.74
Accuracy (mean)
· 2020-10-05
Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approach
Code
#5
ELR+
SOTA
94.34
Accuracy (mean)
· 2020-06-30
Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labels
Code
#6
GNL
91.83
Accuracy (mean)
· 2023-08-02
Partial Label Supervision for Agnostic Generative Noisy Label Learning
Code
#7
ELR
91.41
Accuracy (mean)
· 2020-06-30
Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labels
Code
#8
CAL
90.74
Accuracy (mean)
· 2021-02-10
Clusterability as an Alternative to Anchor Points When Learning with Noisy Labels
Code
#9
Co-Teaching
SOTA
90.15
Accuracy (mean)
· 2018-04-18
Co-teaching: Robust Training of Deep Neural Networks with Extremely Noisy Labels
Code
#10
Negative-LS
90.13
Accuracy (mean)
· 2021-06-08
To Smooth or Not? When Label Smoothing Meets Noisy Labels
Code
#11
JoCoR
90.11
Accuracy (mean)
· 2020-03-05
Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularization
Code
#12
Divide-Mix
89.97
Accuracy (mean)
· 2020-02-18
DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised Learning
Code
#13
Positive-LS
89.82
Accuracy (mean)
· 2020-03-05
Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?
#14
CORES
89.79
Accuracy (mean)
· 2020-10-05
Learning with Instance-Dependent Label Noise: A Sample Sieve Approach
Code
#15
F-div
89.55
Accuracy (mean)
· 2020-11-07
When Optimizing $f$-divergence is Robust with Label Noise
Code
#16
Co-Teaching+
89.54
Accuracy (mean)
· 2019-01-14
How does Disagreement Help Generalization against Label Corruption?
Code
#17
Peer Loss
88.57
Accuracy (mean)
· 2019-10-08
Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Rates
Code
#18
VolMinNet
88.19
Accuracy (mean)
· 2021-02-04
Provably End-to-end Label-Noise Learning without Anchor Points
Code
#19
T-Revision
87.79
Accuracy (mean)
· 2019-06-01
Are Anchor Points Really Indispensable in Label-Noise Learning?
Code
#20
GCE
87.58
Accuracy (mean)
· 2018-05-20
Generalized Cross Entropy Loss for Training Deep Neural Networks with Noisy Labels
Code
#21
Forward-T
SOTA
87.04
Accuracy (mean)
· 2016-09-13
Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approach
Code
#22
Backward-T
86.86
Accuracy (mean)
· 2016-09-13
Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approach
Code
#23
CE
85.16
Accuracy (mean)
No paper