Xingrui Yu, Bo Han, Jiangchao Yao, Gang Niu, Ivor W. Tsang, Masashi Sugiyama
Learning with noisy labels is one of the hottest problems in weakly-supervised learning. Based on memorization effects of deep neural networks, training on small-loss instances becomes very promising for handling noisy labels. This fosters the state-of-the-art approach "Co-teaching" that cross-trains two deep neural networks using the small-loss trick. However, with the increase of epochs, two networks converge to a consensus and Co-teaching reduces to the self-training MentorNet. To tackle this issue, we propose a robust learning paradigm called Co-teaching+, which bridges the "Update by Disagreement" strategy with the original Co-teaching. First, two networks feed forward and predict all data, but keep prediction disagreement data only. Then, among such disagreement data, each network selects its small-loss data, but back propagates the small-loss data from its peer network and updates its own parameters. Empirical results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that Co-teaching+ is much superior to many state-of-the-art methods in the robustness of trained models.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10N-Random2 | Accuracy (mean) | 89.47 | Co-Teaching+ |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10N-Random3 | Accuracy (mean) | 89.54 | Co-Teaching+ |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10N-Aggregate | Accuracy (mean) | 90.61 | Co-Teaching+ |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10N-Random1 | Accuracy (mean) | 89.7 | Co-Teaching+ |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-100N | Accuracy (mean) | 57.88 | Co-Teaching+ |
| Image Classification | CIFAR-10N-Worst | Accuracy (mean) | 83.26 | Co-Teaching+ |
| Document Text Classification | CIFAR-10N-Random2 | Accuracy (mean) | 89.47 | Co-Teaching+ |
| Document Text Classification | CIFAR-10N-Random3 | Accuracy (mean) | 89.54 | Co-Teaching+ |
| Document Text Classification | CIFAR-10N-Aggregate | Accuracy (mean) | 90.61 | Co-Teaching+ |
| Document Text Classification | CIFAR-10N-Random1 | Accuracy (mean) | 89.7 | Co-Teaching+ |
| Document Text Classification | CIFAR-100N | Accuracy (mean) | 57.88 | Co-Teaching+ |
| Document Text Classification | CIFAR-10N-Worst | Accuracy (mean) | 83.26 | Co-Teaching+ |