TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/Divide-Mix

Divide-Mix

Reported on 12 benchmarks across 2 tasks · 1 paper · 8 SOTA

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Computer Vision6 results

  • Image ClassificationonCIFAR-10N-Random2
    Accuracy (mean)· 2020-02-18
    90.9
    best: 96.21 (PSSCL)
    SOTA
    DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised LearningarXiv:2002.07394
  • Image ClassificationonCIFAR-10N-Aggregate
    Accuracy (mean)· 2020-02-18
    95.01
    best: 97.39 (ProMix)
    SOTA
    DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised LearningarXiv:2002.07394
  • Image ClassificationonCIFAR-100N
    Accuracy (mean)· 2020-02-18
    71.13
    best: 74.08 (PGDF)
    SOTA
    DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised LearningarXiv:2002.07394
  • Image ClassificationonCIFAR-10N-Worst
    Accuracy (mean)· 2020-02-18
    92.56
    best: 96.16 (ProMix)
    SOTA
    DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised LearningarXiv:2002.07394
  • Image ClassificationonCIFAR-10N-Random3
    Accuracy (mean)· 2020-02-18
    89.97
    best: 96.49 (PSSCL)
    DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised LearningarXiv:2002.07394
  • Image ClassificationonCIFAR-10N-Random1
    Accuracy (mean)· 2020-02-18
    90.18
    best: 96.97 (ProMix)
    DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised LearningarXiv:2002.07394

Medical6 results

  • Document Text ClassificationonCIFAR-10N-Random2
    Accuracy (mean)· 2020-02-18
    90.9
    best: 96.21 (PSSCL)
    SOTA
    DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised LearningarXiv:2002.07394
  • Document Text ClassificationonCIFAR-10N-Aggregate
    Accuracy (mean)· 2020-02-18
    95.01
    best: 97.39 (ProMix)
    SOTA
    DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised LearningarXiv:2002.07394
  • Document Text ClassificationonCIFAR-100N
    Accuracy (mean)· 2020-02-18
    71.13
    best: 74.08 (PGDF)
    SOTA
    DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised LearningarXiv:2002.07394
  • Document Text ClassificationonCIFAR-10N-Worst
    Accuracy (mean)· 2020-02-18
    92.56
    best: 96.16 (ProMix)
    SOTA
    DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised LearningarXiv:2002.07394
  • Document Text ClassificationonCIFAR-10N-Random3
    Accuracy (mean)· 2020-02-18
    89.97
    best: 96.49 (PSSCL)
    DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised LearningarXiv:2002.07394
  • Document Text ClassificationonCIFAR-10N-Random1
    Accuracy (mean)· 2020-02-18
    90.18
    best: 96.97 (ProMix)
    DivideMix: Learning with Noisy Labels as Semi-supervised LearningarXiv:2002.07394