TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noi...

Early-Learning Regularization Prevents Memorization of Noisy Labels

Sheng Liu, Jonathan Niles-Weed, Narges Razavian, Carlos Fernandez-Granda

2020-06-30NeurIPS 2020 12Image ClassificationLearning with noisy labelsGeneral ClassificationMemorization
PaperPDFCodeCode(official)

Abstract

We propose a novel framework to perform classification via deep learning in the presence of noisy annotations. When trained on noisy labels, deep neural networks have been observed to first fit the training data with clean labels during an "early learning" phase, before eventually memorizing the examples with false labels. We prove that early learning and memorization are fundamental phenomena in high-dimensional classification tasks, even in simple linear models, and give a theoretical explanation in this setting. Motivated by these findings, we develop a new technique for noisy classification tasks, which exploits the progress of the early learning phase. In contrast with existing approaches, which use the model output during early learning to detect the examples with clean labels, and either ignore or attempt to correct the false labels, we take a different route and instead capitalize on early learning via regularization. There are two key elements to our approach. First, we leverage semi-supervised learning techniques to produce target probabilities based on the model outputs. Second, we design a regularization term that steers the model towards these targets, implicitly preventing memorization of the false labels. The resulting framework is shown to provide robustness to noisy annotations on several standard benchmarks and real-world datasets, where it achieves results comparable to the state of the art.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Image Classificationmini WebVision 1.0ImageNet Top-1 Accuracy70.29ELR+ (Inception-ResNet-v2)
Image Classificationmini WebVision 1.0ImageNet Top-5 Accuracy89.76ELR+ (Inception-ResNet-v2)
Image Classificationmini WebVision 1.0Top-1 Accuracy77.78ELR+ (Inception-ResNet-v2)
Image Classificationmini WebVision 1.0Top-5 Accuracy91.68ELR+ (Inception-ResNet-v2)
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random2Accuracy (mean)94.2ELR+
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random2Accuracy (mean)91.61ELR
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random3Accuracy (mean)94.34ELR+
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random3Accuracy (mean)91.41ELR
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-AggregateAccuracy (mean)94.83ELR+
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-AggregateAccuracy (mean)92.38ELR
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random1Accuracy (mean)94.43ELR+
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random1Accuracy (mean)91.46ELR
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100NAccuracy (mean)66.72ELR+
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100NAccuracy (mean)58.94ELR
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-WorstAccuracy (mean)91.09ELR+
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-WorstAccuracy (mean)83.58ELR
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random2Accuracy (mean)94.2ELR+
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random2Accuracy (mean)91.61ELR
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random3Accuracy (mean)94.34ELR+
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random3Accuracy (mean)91.41ELR
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-AggregateAccuracy (mean)94.83ELR+
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-AggregateAccuracy (mean)92.38ELR
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random1Accuracy (mean)94.43ELR+
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random1Accuracy (mean)91.46ELR
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-100NAccuracy (mean)66.72ELR+
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-100NAccuracy (mean)58.94ELR
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-WorstAccuracy (mean)91.09ELR+
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-WorstAccuracy (mean)83.58ELR

Related Papers

Automatic Classification and Segmentation of Tunnel Cracks Based on Deep Learning and Visual Explanations2025-07-18Adversarial attacks to image classification systems using evolutionary algorithms2025-07-17Efficient Adaptation of Pre-trained Vision Transformer underpinned by Approximately Orthogonal Fine-Tuning Strategy2025-07-17Federated Learning for Commercial Image Sources2025-07-17MUPAX: Multidimensional Problem Agnostic eXplainable AI2025-07-17CLID-MU: Cross-Layer Information Divergence Based Meta Update Strategy for Learning with Noisy Labels2025-07-16Hashed Watermark as a Filter: Defeating Forging and Overwriting Attacks in Weight-based Neural Network Watermarking2025-07-15What Should LLMs Forget? Quantifying Personal Data in LLMs for Right-to-Be-Forgotten Requests2025-07-15