TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training meth...

Combating noisy labels by agreement: A joint training method with co-regularization

Hongxin Wei, Lei Feng, Xiangyu Chen, Bo An

2020-03-05CVPR 2020 6Image ClassificationLearning with noisy labels
PaperPDFCode(official)Code

Abstract

Deep Learning with noisy labels is a practically challenging problem in weakly supervised learning. The state-of-the-art approaches "Decoupling" and "Co-teaching+" claim that the "disagreement" strategy is crucial for alleviating the problem of learning with noisy labels. In this paper, we start from a different perspective and propose a robust learning paradigm called JoCoR, which aims to reduce the diversity of two networks during training. Specifically, we first use two networks to make predictions on the same mini-batch data and calculate a joint loss with Co-Regularization for each training example. Then we select small-loss examples to update the parameters of both two networks simultaneously. Trained by the joint loss, these two networks would be more and more similar due to the effect of Co-Regularization. Extensive experimental results on corrupted data from benchmark datasets including MNIST, CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100 and Clothing1M demonstrate that JoCoR is superior to many state-of-the-art approaches for learning with noisy labels.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random2Accuracy (mean)90.21JoCoR
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random3Accuracy (mean)90.11JoCoR
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-AggregateAccuracy (mean)91.44JoCoR
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random1Accuracy (mean)90.3JoCoR
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100NAccuracy (mean)59.97JoCoR
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-WorstAccuracy (mean)83.37JoCoR
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random2Accuracy (mean)90.21JoCoR
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random3Accuracy (mean)90.11JoCoR
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-AggregateAccuracy (mean)91.44JoCoR
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random1Accuracy (mean)90.3JoCoR
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-100NAccuracy (mean)59.97JoCoR
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-WorstAccuracy (mean)83.37JoCoR

Related Papers

Automatic Classification and Segmentation of Tunnel Cracks Based on Deep Learning and Visual Explanations2025-07-18Adversarial attacks to image classification systems using evolutionary algorithms2025-07-17Efficient Adaptation of Pre-trained Vision Transformer underpinned by Approximately Orthogonal Fine-Tuning Strategy2025-07-17Federated Learning for Commercial Image Sources2025-07-17MUPAX: Multidimensional Problem Agnostic eXplainable AI2025-07-17CLID-MU: Cross-Layer Information Divergence Based Meta Update Strategy for Learning with Noisy Labels2025-07-16Hashed Watermark as a Filter: Defeating Forging and Overwriting Attacks in Weight-based Neural Network Watermarking2025-07-15Transferring Styles for Reduced Texture Bias and Improved Robustness in Semantic Segmentation Networks2025-07-14