Goutam Bhat, Martin Danelljan, Luc van Gool, Radu Timofte
The current strive towards end-to-end trainable computer vision systems imposes major challenges for the task of visual tracking. In contrast to most other vision problems, tracking requires the learning of a robust target-specific appearance model online, during the inference stage. To be end-to-end trainable, the online learning of the target model thus needs to be embedded in the tracking architecture itself. Due to the imposed challenges, the popular Siamese paradigm simply predicts a target feature template, while ignoring the background appearance information during inference. Consequently, the predicted model possesses limited target-background discriminability. We develop an end-to-end tracking architecture, capable of fully exploiting both target and background appearance information for target model prediction. Our architecture is derived from a discriminative learning loss by designing a dedicated optimization process that is capable of predicting a powerful model in only a few iterations. Furthermore, our approach is able to learn key aspects of the discriminative loss itself. The proposed tracker sets a new state-of-the-art on 6 tracking benchmarks, achieving an EAO score of 0.440 on VOT2018, while running at over 40 FPS. The code and models are available at https://github.com/visionml/pytracking.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video | NT-VOT211 | AUC | 35.89 | DiMP-50 |
| Video | NT-VOT211 | Precision | 48.68 | DiMP-50 |
| Object Tracking | FE108 | Averaged Precision | 85.1 | DiMP |
| Object Tracking | FE108 | Success Rate | 57.1 | DiMP |
| Object Tracking | LaSOT | AUC | 56.8 | DiMP |
| Object Tracking | LaSOT | Normalized Precision | 65 | DiMP |
| Object Tracking | LaSOT | Precision | 56.7 | DiMP |
| Object Tracking | LaSOT | Precision | 68.7 | DiMP-50 |
| Object Tracking | GOT-10k | Average Overlap | 61.1 | DiMP |
| Object Tracking | GOT-10k | Success Rate 0.5 | 71.7 | DiMP |
| Object Tracking | TrackingNet | Accuracy | 74 | DiMP-50 |
| Object Tracking | TrackingNet | Normalized Precision | 80.1 | DiMP-50 |
| Object Tracking | NT-VOT211 | AUC | 35.89 | DiMP-50 |
| Object Tracking | NT-VOT211 | Precision | 48.68 | DiMP-50 |
| Visual Object Tracking | LaSOT | AUC | 56.8 | DiMP |
| Visual Object Tracking | LaSOT | Normalized Precision | 65 | DiMP |
| Visual Object Tracking | LaSOT | Precision | 56.7 | DiMP |
| Visual Object Tracking | LaSOT | Precision | 68.7 | DiMP-50 |
| Visual Object Tracking | GOT-10k | Average Overlap | 61.1 | DiMP |
| Visual Object Tracking | GOT-10k | Success Rate 0.5 | 71.7 | DiMP |
| Visual Object Tracking | TrackingNet | Accuracy | 74 | DiMP-50 |
| Visual Object Tracking | TrackingNet | Normalized Precision | 80.1 | DiMP-50 |