TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/DriveAdapter: Breaking the Coupling Barrier of Perception ...

DriveAdapter: Breaking the Coupling Barrier of Perception and Planning in End-to-End Autonomous Driving

Xiaosong Jia, Yulu Gao, Li Chen, Junchi Yan, Patrick Langechuan Liu, Hongyang Li

2023-08-01ICCV 2023 1CARLA longest6Autonomous Driving
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

End-to-end autonomous driving aims to build a fully differentiable system that takes raw sensor data as inputs and directly outputs the planned trajectory or control signals of the ego vehicle. State-of-the-art methods usually follow the `Teacher-Student' paradigm. The Teacher model uses privileged information (ground-truth states of surrounding agents and map elements) to learn the driving strategy. The student model only has access to raw sensor data and conducts behavior cloning on the data collected by the teacher model. By eliminating the noise of the perception part during planning learning, state-of-the-art works could achieve better performance with significantly less data compared to those coupled ones. However, under the current Teacher-Student paradigm, the student model still needs to learn a planning head from scratch, which could be challenging due to the redundant and noisy nature of raw sensor inputs and the casual confusion issue of behavior cloning. In this work, we aim to explore the possibility of directly adopting the strong teacher model to conduct planning while letting the student model focus more on the perception part. We find that even equipped with a SOTA perception model, directly letting the student model learn the required inputs of the teacher model leads to poor driving performance, which comes from the large distribution gap between predicted privileged inputs and the ground-truth. To this end, we propose DriveAdapter, which employs adapters with the feature alignment objective function between the student (perception) and teacher (planning) modules. Additionally, since the pure learning-based teacher model itself is imperfect and occasionally breaks safety rules, we propose a method of action-guided feature learning with a mask for those imperfect teacher features to further inject the priors of hand-crafted rules into the learning process.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Autonomous VehiclesBench2DriveDriving Score64.22DriveAdapter
Autonomous DrivingBench2DriveDriving Score64.22DriveAdapter
CARLA longest6CARLADriving Score71DriveAdapter+TCP
CARLA longest6CARLAInfraction Score0.85DriveAdapter+TCP
CARLA longest6CARLARoute Completion88DriveAdapter+TCP
CARLA longest6CARLADriving Score59DriveAdapter
CARLA longest6CARLAInfraction Score0.68DriveAdapter
CARLA longest6CARLARoute Completion82DriveAdapter

Related Papers

GEMINUS: Dual-aware Global and Scene-Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts for End-to-End Autonomous Driving2025-07-19AGENTS-LLM: Augmentative GENeration of Challenging Traffic Scenarios with an Agentic LLM Framework2025-07-18World Model-Based End-to-End Scene Generation for Accident Anticipation in Autonomous Driving2025-07-17Orbis: Overcoming Challenges of Long-Horizon Prediction in Driving World Models2025-07-17Channel-wise Motion Features for Efficient Motion Segmentation2025-07-17LaViPlan : Language-Guided Visual Path Planning with RLVR2025-07-17Safeguarding Federated Learning-based Road Condition Classification2025-07-16Towards Autonomous Riding: A Review of Perception, Planning, and Control in Intelligent Two-Wheelers2025-07-16