Tasks SotA Datasets Papers Methods Submit About

Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable Benchmarks All SotA Datasets Papers Methods

Community

Submit Results About

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/STARK

STARK

Reported on 18 benchmarks across 3 tasks · 1 paper · 8 SOTA

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Computer Vision18 results

Object TrackingonGOT-10k
Average Overlap· 2021-03-31
68.8
best: 81.7 (SAMURAI-L)
SOTA
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154
Object TrackingonGOT-10k
Success Rate 0.5· 2021-03-31
78.1
best: 92.2 (SAMURAI-L)
SOTA
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154
Object TrackingonTrackingNet
Accuracy· 2021-03-31
82
best: 87.9 (MCITrack-L384)
SOTA
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154
Object TrackingonTrackingNet
Normalized Precision· 2021-03-31
86.9
best: 92.1 (MCITrack-L384)
SOTA
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154
Visual Object TrackingonGOT-10k
Average Overlap· 2021-03-31
68.8
best: 81.7 (SAMURAI-L)
SOTA
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154
Visual Object TrackingonGOT-10k
Success Rate 0.5· 2021-03-31
78.1
best: 92.2 (SAMURAI-L)
SOTA
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154
Visual Object TrackingonTrackingNet
Accuracy· 2021-03-31
82
best: 87.9 (MCITrack-L384)
SOTA
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154
Visual Object TrackingonTrackingNet
Normalized Precision· 2021-03-31
86.9
best: 92.1 (MCITrack-L384)
SOTA
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154
VideoonNT-VOT211
AUC· 2021-03-31
38.26
best: 40.1 (ProContEXT)
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154
VideoonNT-VOT211
Precision· 2021-03-31
51.37
best: 55.8 (ODTrack)
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154
Object TrackingonLaSOT
AUC· 2021-03-31
67.1
best: 77.4 (SPMTrack-G)
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154
Object TrackingonLaSOT
Normalized Precision· 2021-03-31
77
best: 86.6 (SPMTrack-G)
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154
Object TrackingonTrackingNet
Precision· 2021-03-31
79.1
best: 89.2 (MCITrack-L384)
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154
Object TrackingonNT-VOT211
AUC· 2021-03-31
38.26
best: 40.1 (ProContEXT)
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154
Object TrackingonNT-VOT211
Precision· 2021-03-31
51.37
best: 55.8 (ODTrack)
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154
Visual Object TrackingonLaSOT
AUC· 2021-03-31
67.1
best: 77.4 (SPMTrack-G)
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154
Visual Object TrackingonLaSOT
Normalized Precision· 2021-03-31
77
best: 86.6 (SPMTrack-G)
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154
Visual Object TrackingonTrackingNet
Precision· 2021-03-31
79.1
best: 89.2 (MCITrack-L384)
Learning Spatio-Temporal Transformer for Visual Tracking arXiv:2103.17154