TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Real-Time Dynamic Scale-Aware Fusion Detection Network: Ta...

Real-Time Dynamic Scale-Aware Fusion Detection Network: Take Road Damage Detection as an example

Weichao Pan, Xu Wang, Wenqing Huan

2024-09-04Real-Time Object Detection2D Object Detectionobject-detectionRoad Damage DetectionObject Detection
PaperPDFCode

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-based Road Damage Detection (RDD) is important for daily maintenance and safety in cities, especially in terms of significantly reducing labor costs. However, current UAV-based RDD research is still faces many challenges. For example, the damage with irregular size and direction, the masking of damage by the background, and the difficulty of distinguishing damage from the background significantly affect the ability of UAV to detect road damage in daily inspection. To solve these problems and improve the performance of UAV in real-time road damage detection, we design and propose three corresponding modules: a feature extraction module that flexibly adapts to shape and background; a module that fuses multiscale perception and adapts to shape and background ; an efficient downsampling module. Based on these modules, we designed a multi-scale, adaptive road damage detection model with the ability to automatically remove background interference, called Dynamic Scale-Aware Fusion Detection Model (RT-DSAFDet). Experimental results on the UAV-PDD2023 public dataset show that our model RT-DSAFDet achieves a mAP50 of 54.2%, which is 11.1% higher than that of YOLOv10-m, an efficient variant of the latest real-time object detection model YOLOv10, while the amount of parameters is reduced to 1.8M and FLOPs to 4.6G, with a decreased by 88% and 93%, respectively. Furthermore, on the large generalized object detection public dataset MS COCO2017 also shows the superiority of our model with mAP50-95 is the same as YOLOv9-t, but with 0.5% higher mAP50, 10% less parameters volume, and 40% less FLOPs.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
2D Object DetectionUAV-PDD2023AP@0.554.2RT-DSAFDet

Related Papers

A Real-Time System for Egocentric Hand-Object Interaction Detection in Industrial Domains2025-07-17RS-TinyNet: Stage-wise Feature Fusion Network for Detecting Tiny Objects in Remote Sensing Images2025-07-17Decoupled PROB: Decoupled Query Initialization Tasks and Objectness-Class Learning for Open World Object Detection2025-07-17Dual LiDAR-Based Traffic Movement Count Estimation at a Signalized Intersection: Deployment, Data Collection, and Preliminary Analysis2025-07-17Vision-based Perception for Autonomous Vehicles in Obstacle Avoidance Scenarios2025-07-16Tomato Multi-Angle Multi-Pose Dataset for Fine-Grained Phenotyping2025-07-15ECORE: Energy-Conscious Optimized Routing for Deep Learning Models at the Edge2025-07-08Beyond One Shot, Beyond One Perspective: Cross-View and Long-Horizon Distillation for Better LiDAR Representations2025-07-07