TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/SPICE: Semantic Pseudo-labeling for Image Clustering

SPICE: Semantic Pseudo-labeling for Image Clustering

Chuang Niu, Hongming Shan, Ge Wang

2021-03-17Deep ClusteringRepresentation LearningImage ClusteringSemantic SimilaritySemantic Textual SimilarityClusteringContrastive Learning
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

The similarity among samples and the discrepancy between clusters are two crucial aspects of image clustering. However, current deep clustering methods suffer from the inaccurate estimation of either feature similarity or semantic discrepancy. In this paper, we present a Semantic Pseudo-labeling-based Image ClustEring (SPICE) framework, which divides the clustering network into a feature model for measuring the instance-level similarity and a clustering head for identifying the cluster-level discrepancy. We design two semantics-aware pseudo-labeling algorithms, prototype pseudo-labeling, and reliable pseudo-labeling, which enable accurate and reliable self-supervision over clustering. Without using any ground-truth label, we optimize the clustering network in three stages: 1) train the feature model through contrastive learning to measure the instance similarity, 2) train the clustering head with the prototype pseudo-labeling algorithm to identify cluster semantics, and 3) jointly train the feature model and clustering head with the reliable pseudo-labeling algorithm to improve the clustering performance. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that SPICE achieves significant improvements (~10%) over existing methods and establishes the new state-of-the-art clustering results on six image benchmark datasets in terms of three popular metrics. Importantly, SPICE significantly reduces the gap between unsupervised and fully-supervised classification; e.g., there is only a 2% (91.8% vs 93.8%) accuracy difference on CIFAR-10. Our code has been made publically available at https://github.com/niuchuangnn/SPICE.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Image ClusteringImageNet-10ARI0.933SPICE
Image ClusteringImageNet-10Accuracy0.969SPICE
Image ClusteringImageNet-10NMI0.927SPICE
Image ClusteringCIFAR-10ARI0.836SPICE*
Image ClusteringCIFAR-10Accuracy0.918SPICE*
Image ClusteringCIFAR-10NMI0.85SPICE*
Image ClusteringTiny-ImageNetARI0.161SPICE
Image ClusteringTiny-ImageNetAccuracy0.305SPICE
Image ClusteringTiny-ImageNetNMI0.449SPICE
Image ClusteringCIFAR-100ARI0.422SPICE*
Image ClusteringCIFAR-100Accuracy0.584SPICE*
Image ClusteringCIFAR-100NMI0.583SPICE*
Image ClusteringSTL-10Accuracy0.929SPICE*
Image ClusteringSTL-10NMI0.86SPICE*
Image ClusteringImagenet-dog-15ARI0.526SPICE
Image ClusteringImagenet-dog-15Accuracy0.675SPICE
Image ClusteringImagenet-dog-15NMI0.627SPICE

Related Papers

Touch in the Wild: Learning Fine-Grained Manipulation with a Portable Visuo-Tactile Gripper2025-07-20Tri-Learn Graph Fusion Network for Attributed Graph Clustering2025-07-18Spectral Bellman Method: Unifying Representation and Exploration in RL2025-07-17Boosting Team Modeling through Tempo-Relational Representation Learning2025-07-17SemCSE: Semantic Contrastive Sentence Embeddings Using LLM-Generated Summaries For Scientific Abstracts2025-07-17HapticCap: A Multimodal Dataset and Task for Understanding User Experience of Vibration Haptic Signals2025-07-17Overview of the TalentCLEF 2025: Skill and Job Title Intelligence for Human Capital Management2025-07-17SGCL: Unifying Self-Supervised and Supervised Learning for Graph Recommendation2025-07-17