TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Category-Aware Dynamic Label Assignment with High-Quality ...

Category-Aware Dynamic Label Assignment with High-Quality Oriented Proposal

Mingkui Feng, Hancheng Yu, Xiaoyu Dang, Ming Zhou

2024-07-03regressionObject Detection In Aerial ImagesOriented Object Detectionobject-detectionObject Detection
PaperPDF

Abstract

Objects in aerial images are typically embedded in complex backgrounds and exhibit arbitrary orientations. When employing oriented bounding boxes (OBB) to represent arbitrary oriented objects, the periodicity of angles could lead to discontinuities in label regression values at the boundaries, inducing abrupt fluctuations in the loss function. To address this problem, an OBB representation based on the complex plane is introduced in the oriented detection framework, and a trigonometric loss function is proposed. Moreover, leveraging prior knowledge of complex background environments and significant differences in large objects in aerial images, a conformer RPN head is constructed to predict angle information. The proposed loss function and conformer RPN head jointly generate high-quality oriented proposals. A category-aware dynamic label assignment based on predicted category feedback is proposed to address the limitations of solely relying on IoU for proposal label assignment. This method makes negative sample selection more representative, ensuring consistency between classification and regression features. Experiments were conducted on four realistic oriented detection datasets, and the results demonstrate superior performance in oriented object detection with minimal parameter tuning and time costs. Specifically, mean average precision (mAP) scores of 82.02%, 71.99%, 69.87%, and 98.77% were achieved on the DOTA-v1.0, DOTA-v1.5, DIOR-R, and HRSC2016 datasets, respectively.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Object DetectionHRSC2016mAP-0790.89CDLA-HOP
Object DetectionHRSC2016mAP-1298.77CDLA-HOP
3DHRSC2016mAP-0790.89CDLA-HOP
3DHRSC2016mAP-1298.77CDLA-HOP
2D ClassificationHRSC2016mAP-0790.89CDLA-HOP
2D ClassificationHRSC2016mAP-1298.77CDLA-HOP
2D Object DetectionHRSC2016mAP-0790.89CDLA-HOP
2D Object DetectionHRSC2016mAP-1298.77CDLA-HOP
16kHRSC2016mAP-0790.89CDLA-HOP
16kHRSC2016mAP-1298.77CDLA-HOP

Related Papers

Language Integration in Fine-Tuning Multimodal Large Language Models for Image-Based Regression2025-07-20A Real-Time System for Egocentric Hand-Object Interaction Detection in Industrial Domains2025-07-17RS-TinyNet: Stage-wise Feature Fusion Network for Detecting Tiny Objects in Remote Sensing Images2025-07-17Decoupled PROB: Decoupled Query Initialization Tasks and Objectness-Class Learning for Open World Object Detection2025-07-17Dual LiDAR-Based Traffic Movement Count Estimation at a Signalized Intersection: Deployment, Data Collection, and Preliminary Analysis2025-07-17Neural Network-Guided Symbolic Regression for Interpretable Descriptor Discovery in Perovskite Catalysts2025-07-16Imbalanced Regression Pipeline Recommendation2025-07-16Second-Order Bounds for [0,1]-Valued Regression via Betting Loss2025-07-16