TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Validity Learning on Failures: Mitigating the Distribution...

Validity Learning on Failures: Mitigating the Distribution Shift in Autonomous Vehicle Planning

Fazel Arasteh, Mohammed Elmahgiubi, Behzad Khamidehi, Hamidreza Mirkhani, Weize Zhang, Cao Tongtong, Kasra Rezaee

2024-06-03Representation LearningImitation LearningAutonomous Driving
PaperPDF

Abstract

The planning problem constitutes a fundamental aspect of the autonomous driving framework. Recent strides in representation learning have empowered vehicles to comprehend their surrounding environments, thereby facilitating the integration of learning-based planning strategies. Among these approaches, Imitation Learning stands out due to its notable training efficiency. However, traditional Imitation Learning methodologies encounter challenges associated with the co-variate shift phenomenon. We propose Validity Learning on Failures, VL(on failure), as a remedy to address this issue. The essence of our method lies in deploying a pre-trained planner across diverse scenarios. Instances where the planner deviates from its immediate objectives, such as maintaining a safe distance from obstacles or adhering to traffic rules, are flagged as failures. The states corresponding to these failures are compiled into a new dataset, termed the failure dataset. Notably, the absence of expert annotations for this data precludes the applicability of standard imitation learning approaches. To facilitate learning from the closed-loop mistakes, we introduce the VL objective which aims to discern valid trajectories within the current environmental context. Experimental evaluations conducted on both reactive CARLA simulation and non-reactive log-replay simulations reveal substantial enhancements in closed-loop metrics such as \textit{Score, Progress}, and Success Rate, underscoring the effectiveness of the proposed methodology. Further evaluations against the Bench2Drive benchmark demonstrate that VL(on failure) outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by a large margin.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Autonomous VehiclesBench2DriveDriving Score73.29VL (on failure)
Autonomous DrivingBench2DriveDriving Score73.29VL (on failure)

Related Papers

Touch in the Wild: Learning Fine-Grained Manipulation with a Portable Visuo-Tactile Gripper2025-07-20GEMINUS: Dual-aware Global and Scene-Adaptive Mixture-of-Experts for End-to-End Autonomous Driving2025-07-19AGENTS-LLM: Augmentative GENeration of Challenging Traffic Scenarios with an Agentic LLM Framework2025-07-18Spectral Bellman Method: Unifying Representation and Exploration in RL2025-07-17Boosting Team Modeling through Tempo-Relational Representation Learning2025-07-17The Imitation Game: Turing Machine Imitator is Length Generalizable Reasoner2025-07-17Supervised Fine Tuning on Curated Data is Reinforcement Learning (and can be improved)2025-07-17World Model-Based End-to-End Scene Generation for Accident Anticipation in Autonomous Driving2025-07-17