Silvio Galesso, Max Argus, Thomas Brox
The key to out-of-distribution detection is density estimation of the in-distribution data or of its feature representations. This is particularly challenging for dense anomaly detection in domains where the in-distribution data has a complex underlying structure. Nearest-Neighbors approaches have been shown to work well in object-centric data domains, such as industrial inspection and image classification. In this paper, we show that nearest-neighbor approaches also yield state-of-the-art results on dense novelty detection in complex driving scenes when working with an appropriate feature representation. In particular, we find that transformer-based architectures produce representations that yield much better similarity metrics for the task. We identify the multi-head structure of these models as one of the reasons, and demonstrate a way to transfer some of the improvements to CNNs. Ultimately, the approach is simple and non-invasive, i.e., it does not affect the primary segmentation performance, refrains from training on examples of anomalies, and achieves state-of-the-art results on RoadAnomaly, StreetHazards, and SegmentMeIfYouCan-Anomaly.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anomaly Detection | Road Anomaly | AP | 85.6 | cDNP |
| Anomaly Detection | Road Anomaly | FPR95 | 9.8 | cDNP |
| Anomaly Detection | Fishyscapes L&F | AP | 69.8 | cDNP+OE |
| Anomaly Detection | Fishyscapes L&F | FPR95 | 7.5 | cDNP+OE |
| Anomaly Detection | Fishyscapes L&F | AP | 62.2 | cDNP |
| Anomaly Detection | Fishyscapes L&F | FPR95 | 8.9 | cDNP |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | ADE-OoD | AP | 62.35 | cDNP |
| Out-of-Distribution Detection | ADE-OoD | FPR@95 | 39.2 | cDNP |