TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/HAN

HAN

Reported on 16 benchmarks across 6 tasks · 2 papers · 4 SOTA

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Methodology8 results

  • Multi-Label Text ClassificationonMIMIC-III
    Micro-F1· 2020-10-29
    40.7
    SOTA
    Explainable Automated Coding of Clinical Notes using Hierarchical Label-wise Attention Networks and Label Embedding InitialisationarXiv:2010.15728
  • ClassificationonMIMIC-III
    Micro-F1· 2020-10-29
    40.7
    SOTA
    Explainable Automated Coding of Clinical Notes using Hierarchical Label-wise Attention Networks and Label Embedding InitialisationarXiv:2010.15728
  • Multi-Label ClassificationonMIMIC-III
    Macro-AUC· 2020-10-29
    88.5
    best: 96.2 (GKI-ICD)
    Explainable Automated Coding of Clinical Notes using Hierarchical Label-wise Attention Networks and Label Embedding InitialisationarXiv:2010.15728
  • Multi-Label ClassificationonMIMIC-III
    Macro-F1· 2020-10-29
    3.6
    best: 24.7 (PLM-CA)
    Explainable Automated Coding of Clinical Notes using Hierarchical Label-wise Attention Networks and Label Embedding InitialisationarXiv:2010.15728
  • Multi-Label ClassificationonMIMIC-III
    Micro-AUC· 2020-10-29
    98.1
    best: 99.3 (GKI-ICD)
    Explainable Automated Coding of Clinical Notes using Hierarchical Label-wise Attention Networks and Label Embedding InitialisationarXiv:2010.15728
  • Multi-Label ClassificationonMIMIC-III
    Micro-F1· 2020-10-29
    40.7
    best: 61.2 (GKI-ICD)
    Explainable Automated Coding of Clinical Notes using Hierarchical Label-wise Attention Networks and Label Embedding InitialisationarXiv:2010.15728
  • Multi-Label ClassificationonMIMIC-III
    Precision@8· 2020-10-29
    61.4
    best: 77.7 (GKI-ICD)
    Explainable Automated Coding of Clinical Notes using Hierarchical Label-wise Attention Networks and Label Embedding InitialisationarXiv:2010.15728
  • ClassificationonarXiv-10
    Accuracy
    0.746
    best: 0.794 (Protoformer)

Medical5 results

  • Medical Code PredictiononMIMIC-III
    Macro-AUC· 2020-10-29
    88.5
    best: 96.2 (GKI-ICD)
    Explainable Automated Coding of Clinical Notes using Hierarchical Label-wise Attention Networks and Label Embedding InitialisationarXiv:2010.15728
  • Medical Code PredictiononMIMIC-III
    Macro-F1· 2020-10-29
    3.6
    best: 24.7 (PLM-CA)
    Explainable Automated Coding of Clinical Notes using Hierarchical Label-wise Attention Networks and Label Embedding InitialisationarXiv:2010.15728
  • Medical Code PredictiononMIMIC-III
    Micro-AUC· 2020-10-29
    98.1
    best: 99.3 (GKI-ICD)
    Explainable Automated Coding of Clinical Notes using Hierarchical Label-wise Attention Networks and Label Embedding InitialisationarXiv:2010.15728
  • Medical Code PredictiononMIMIC-III
    Micro-F1· 2020-10-29
    40.7
    best: 61.2 (GKI-ICD)
    Explainable Automated Coding of Clinical Notes using Hierarchical Label-wise Attention Networks and Label Embedding InitialisationarXiv:2010.15728
  • Medical Code PredictiononMIMIC-III
    Precision@8· 2020-10-29
    61.4
    best: 77.7 (GKI-ICD)
    Explainable Automated Coding of Clinical Notes using Hierarchical Label-wise Attention Networks and Label Embedding InitialisationarXiv:2010.15728

Natural Language Processing3 results

  • Text ClassificationonMIMIC-III
    Micro-F1· 2020-10-29
    40.7
    SOTA
    Explainable Automated Coding of Clinical Notes using Hierarchical Label-wise Attention Networks and Label Embedding InitialisationarXiv:2010.15728
  • Visual Question Answering (VQA)onVQA-CP
    Score· 2018-08-01
    28.65
    best: 58.95 (CSS)
    SOTA
    Learning Visual Question Answering by Bootstrapping Hard AttentionarXiv:1808.00300
  • Text ClassificationonarXiv-10
    Accuracy
    0.746
    best: 0.794 (Protoformer)