TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Models/Axial-DeepLab-L (multi-scale)

Axial-DeepLab-L (multi-scale)

Reported on 24 benchmarks across 3 tasks · 1 paper · 15 SOTA

Note: results are matched by exact model name. Different papers may use the same name for different model variants.

Medical8 results

  • Semantic SegmentationonMapillary val
    PQ· 2020-03-17
    41.1
    best: 46.7 (OneFormer (DiNAT-L, single-scale))
    SOTA
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • Semantic SegmentationonMapillary val
    PQst· 2020-03-17
    51.3
    best: 54.9 (OneFormer (DiNAT-L, single-scale))
    SOTA
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • Semantic SegmentationonMapillary val
    PQth· 2020-03-17
    33.4
    best: 40.8 (Panoptic FCN* (Swin-L, single-scale))
    SOTA
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • Semantic SegmentationonMapillary val
    mIoU· 2020-03-17
    58.4
    best: 76 (AO-SegNet)
    SOTA
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • Semantic SegmentationonCOCO minival
    PQ· 2020-03-17
    43.9
    best: 61.2 (HyperSeg (Swin-B))
    SOTA
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • Semantic SegmentationonCOCO test-dev
    PQ· 2020-03-17
    44.2
    best: 59.5 (Mask DINO (single scale))
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • Semantic SegmentationonCOCO test-dev
    PQst· 2020-03-17
    36.8
    best: 58.9 (MaskConver (ResNet50, single-scale))
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • Semantic SegmentationonCOCO test-dev
    PQth· 2020-03-17
    49.2
    best: 65.1 (Mask2Former (Swin-L))
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853

Audio8 results

  • 10-shot image generationonMapillary val
    PQ· 2020-03-17
    41.1
    best: 46.7 (OneFormer (DiNAT-L, single-scale))
    SOTA
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • 10-shot image generationonMapillary val
    PQst· 2020-03-17
    51.3
    best: 54.9 (OneFormer (DiNAT-L, single-scale))
    SOTA
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • 10-shot image generationonMapillary val
    PQth· 2020-03-17
    33.4
    best: 40.8 (Panoptic FCN* (Swin-L, single-scale))
    SOTA
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • 10-shot image generationonMapillary val
    mIoU· 2020-03-17
    58.4
    best: 76 (AO-SegNet)
    SOTA
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • 10-shot image generationonCOCO minival
    PQ· 2020-03-17
    43.9
    best: 61.2 (HyperSeg (Swin-B))
    SOTA
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • 10-shot image generationonCOCO test-dev
    PQ· 2020-03-17
    44.2
    best: 59.5 (Mask DINO (single scale))
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • 10-shot image generationonCOCO test-dev
    PQst· 2020-03-17
    36.8
    best: 58.9 (MaskConver (ResNet50, single-scale))
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • 10-shot image generationonCOCO test-dev
    PQth· 2020-03-17
    49.2
    best: 65.1 (Mask2Former (Swin-L))
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853

Computer Vision8 results

  • Panoptic SegmentationonMapillary val
    PQ· 2020-03-17
    41.1
    best: 46.7 (OneFormer (DiNAT-L, single-scale))
    SOTA
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • Panoptic SegmentationonMapillary val
    PQst· 2020-03-17
    51.3
    best: 54.9 (OneFormer (DiNAT-L, single-scale))
    SOTA
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • Panoptic SegmentationonMapillary val
    PQth· 2020-03-17
    33.4
    best: 40.8 (Panoptic FCN* (Swin-L, single-scale))
    SOTA
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • Panoptic SegmentationonMapillary val
    mIoU· 2020-03-17
    58.4
    best: 61.7 (OneFormer (DiNAT-L, single-scale))
    SOTA
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • Panoptic SegmentationonCOCO minival
    PQ· 2020-03-17
    43.9
    best: 61.2 (HyperSeg (Swin-B))
    SOTA
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • Panoptic SegmentationonCOCO test-dev
    PQ· 2020-03-17
    44.2
    best: 59.5 (Mask DINO (single scale))
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • Panoptic SegmentationonCOCO test-dev
    PQst· 2020-03-17
    36.8
    best: 58.9 (MaskConver (ResNet50, single-scale))
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853
  • Panoptic SegmentationonCOCO test-dev
    PQth· 2020-03-17
    49.2
    best: 65.1 (Mask2Former (Swin-L))
    Axial-DeepLab: Stand-Alone Axial-Attention for Panoptic SegmentationarXiv:2003.07853