The use of deep pre-trained bidirectional transformers has led to remarkable progress in a number of applications (Devlin et al., 2018). For tasks that make pairwise comparisons between sequences, matching a given input with a corresponding label, two approaches are common: Cross-encoders performing full self-attention over the pair and Bi-encoders encoding the pair separately. The former often performs better, but is too slow for practical use. In this work, we develop a new transformer architecture, the Poly-encoder, that learns global rather than token level self-attention features. We perform a detailed comparison of all three approaches, including what pre-training and fine-tuning strategies work best. We show our models achieve state-of-the-art results on three existing tasks; that Poly-encoders are faster than Cross-encoders and more accurate than Bi-encoders; and that the best results are obtained by pre-training on large datasets similar to the downstream tasks.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conversational Response Selection | Douban | MAP | 0.608 | Poly-encoder |
| Conversational Response Selection | Douban | MRR | 0.65 | Poly-encoder |
| Conversational Response Selection | Douban | P@1 | 0.475 | Poly-encoder |
| Conversational Response Selection | Douban | R10@1 | 0.299 | Poly-encoder |
| Conversational Response Selection | Douban | R10@2 | 0.494 | Poly-encoder |
| Conversational Response Selection | Douban | R10@5 | 0.822 | Poly-encoder |
| Conversational Response Selection | RRS Ranking Test | NDCG@3 | 0.679 | Poly-encoder |
| Conversational Response Selection | RRS Ranking Test | NDCG@5 | 0.765 | Poly-encoder |
| Conversational Response Selection | Ubuntu Dialogue (v1, Ranking) | R10@1 | 0.882 | Poly-encoder |
| Conversational Response Selection | Ubuntu Dialogue (v1, Ranking) | R10@2 | 0.949 | Poly-encoder |
| Conversational Response Selection | Ubuntu Dialogue (v1, Ranking) | R10@5 | 0.99 | Poly-encoder |