TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Good Features to Correlate for Visual Tracking

Good Features to Correlate for Visual Tracking

Erhan Gundogdu, A. Aydin Alatan

2017-04-20Visual Object TrackingVisual TrackingObject TrackingGeneral Classification
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

During the recent years, correlation filters have shown dominant and spectacular results for visual object tracking. The types of the features that are employed in these family of trackers significantly affect the performance of visual tracking. The ultimate goal is to utilize robust features invariant to any kind of appearance change of the object, while predicting the object location as properly as in the case of no appearance change. As the deep learning based methods have emerged, the study of learning features for specific tasks has accelerated. For instance, discriminative visual tracking methods based on deep architectures have been studied with promising performance. Nevertheless, correlation filter based (CFB) trackers confine themselves to use the pre-trained networks which are trained for object classification problem. To this end, in this manuscript the problem of learning deep fully convolutional features for the CFB visual tracking is formulated. In order to learn the proposed model, a novel and efficient backpropagation algorithm is presented based on the loss function of the network. The proposed learning framework enables the network model to be flexible for a custom design. Moreover, it alleviates the dependency on the network trained for classification. Extensive performance analysis shows the efficacy of the proposed custom design in the CFB tracking framework. By fine-tuning the convolutional parts of a state-of-the-art network and integrating this model to a CFB tracker, which is the top performing one of VOT2016, 18% increase is achieved in terms of expected average overlap, and tracking failures are decreased by 25%, while maintaining the superiority over the state-of-the-art methods in OTB-2013 and OTB-2015 tracking datasets.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Object TrackingVOT2016Expected Average Overlap (EAO)0.3903CFCF
Visual Object TrackingVOT2016Expected Average Overlap (EAO)0.3903CFCF

Related Papers

MVA 2025 Small Multi-Object Tracking for Spotting Birds Challenge: Dataset, Methods, and Results2025-07-17YOLOv8-SMOT: An Efficient and Robust Framework for Real-Time Small Object Tracking via Slice-Assisted Training and Adaptive Association2025-07-16HiM2SAM: Enhancing SAM2 with Hierarchical Motion Estimation and Memory Optimization towards Long-term Tracking2025-07-10What You Have is What You Track: Adaptive and Robust Multimodal Tracking2025-07-08Robustifying 3D Perception through Least-Squares Multi-Agent Graphs Object Tracking2025-07-07UMDATrack: Unified Multi-Domain Adaptive Tracking Under Adverse Weather Conditions2025-07-01Mamba-FETrack V2: Revisiting State Space Model for Frame-Event based Visual Object Tracking2025-06-30Visual and Memory Dual Adapter for Multi-Modal Object Tracking2025-06-30