TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Dual encoding feature filtering generalized attention UNET...

Dual encoding feature filtering generalized attention UNET for retinal vessel segmentation

Md Tauhidul Islam, Wu Da-Wen, Tang Qing-Qing, Zhao Kai-Yang, Yin Teng, Li Yan-Fei, Shang Wen-Yi, Liu Jing-Yu, Zhang Hai-Xian

2025-06-02Retinal Vessel SegmentationData Augmentation
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

Retinal blood vessel segmentation is crucial for diagnosing ocular and cardiovascular diseases. Although the introduction of U-Net in 2015 by Olaf Ronneberger significantly advanced this field, yet issues like limited training data, imbalance data distribution, and inadequate feature extraction persist, hindering both the segmentation performance and optimal model generalization. Addressing these critical issues, the DEFFA-Unet is proposed featuring an additional encoder to process domain-invariant pre-processed inputs, thereby improving both richer feature encoding and enhanced model generalization. A feature filtering fusion module is developed to ensure the precise feature filtering and robust hybrid feature fusion. In response to the task-specific need for higher precision where false positives are very costly, traditional skip connections are replaced with the attention-guided feature reconstructing fusion module. Additionally, innovative data augmentation and balancing methods are proposed to counter data scarcity and distribution imbalance, further boosting the robustness and generalization of the model. With a comprehensive suite of evaluation metrics, extensive validations on four benchmark datasets (DRIVE, CHASEDB1, STARE, and HRF) and an SLO dataset (IOSTAR), demonstrate the proposed method's superiority over both baseline and state-of-the-art models. Particularly the proposed method significantly outperforms the compared methods in cross-validation model generalization.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Medical Image SegmentationHRF1:1 Accuracy0.9723DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationHRFAUC0.9845DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationHRFAverage IOU0.7089DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationHRFDSC0.8289DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationHRFMCC0.8012DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationCHASE_DB11:1 Accuracy0.9712DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationCHASE_DB1AUC0.9823DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationCHASE_DB1Average IOU0.6891DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationCHASE_DB1DSC0.8156DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationCHASE_DB1MCC0.7892DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationSTARE1:1 Accuracy0.9689DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationSTAREAUC0.9834DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationSTAREAverage IOU0.7012DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationSTAREDSC0.8234DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationSTAREMCC0.7945DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationDRIVE1:1 Accuracy0.9701DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationDRIVEAUC0.9861DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationDRIVEAverage IOU0.7154DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationDRIVEDSC0.8347DEFFA-Unet
Medical Image SegmentationDRIVEMCC0.8079DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationHRF1:1 Accuracy0.9723DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationHRFAUC0.9845DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationHRFAverage IOU0.7089DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationHRFDSC0.8289DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationHRFMCC0.8012DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationCHASE_DB11:1 Accuracy0.9712DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationCHASE_DB1AUC0.9823DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationCHASE_DB1Average IOU0.6891DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationCHASE_DB1DSC0.8156DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationCHASE_DB1MCC0.7892DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationSTARE1:1 Accuracy0.9689DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationSTAREAUC0.9834DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationSTAREAverage IOU0.7012DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationSTAREDSC0.8234DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationSTAREMCC0.7945DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationDRIVE1:1 Accuracy0.9701DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationDRIVEAUC0.9861DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationDRIVEAverage IOU0.7154DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationDRIVEDSC0.8347DEFFA-Unet
Retinal Vessel SegmentationDRIVEMCC0.8079DEFFA-Unet

Related Papers

Overview of the TalentCLEF 2025: Skill and Job Title Intelligence for Human Capital Management2025-07-17Pixel Perfect MegaMed: A Megapixel-Scale Vision-Language Foundation Model for Generating High Resolution Medical Images2025-07-17Similarity-Guided Diffusion for Contrastive Sequential Recommendation2025-07-16Data Augmentation in Time Series Forecasting through Inverted Framework2025-07-15Iceberg: Enhancing HLS Modeling with Synthetic Data2025-07-14AI-Enhanced Pediatric Pneumonia Detection: A CNN-Based Approach Using Data Augmentation and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)2025-07-13FreeAudio: Training-Free Timing Planning for Controllable Long-Form Text-to-Audio Generation2025-07-11DS@GT at CheckThat! 2025: Detecting Subjectivity via Transfer-Learning and Corrective Data Augmentation2025-07-08