TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Why is Normalization Necessary for Linear Recommenders?

Why is Normalization Necessary for Linear Recommenders?

Seongmin Park, Mincheol Yoon, Hye-Young Kim, Jongwuk Lee

2025-04-08Collaborative FilteringRecommendation Systems
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

Despite their simplicity, linear autoencoder (LAE)-based models have shown comparable or even better performance with faster inference speed than neural recommender models. However, LAEs face two critical challenges: (i) popularity bias, which tends to recommend popular items, and (ii) neighborhood bias, which overly focuses on capturing local item correlations. To address these issues, this paper first analyzes the effect of two existing normalization methods for LAEs, i.e., random-walk and symmetric normalization. Our theoretical analysis reveals that normalization highly affects the degree of popularity and neighborhood biases among items. Inspired by this analysis, we propose a versatile normalization solution, called Data-Adaptive Normalization (DAN), which flexibly controls the popularity and neighborhood biases by adjusting item- and user-side normalization to align with unique dataset characteristics. Owing to its model-agnostic property, DAN can be easily applied to various LAE-based models. Experimental results show that DAN-equipped LAEs consistently improve existing LAE-based models across six benchmark datasets, with significant gains of up to 128.57% and 12.36% for long-tail items and unbiased evaluations, respectively. Refer to our code in https://github.com/psm1206/DAN.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Recommendation SystemsGowallaRecall@200.1922RLAE-DAN
Recommendation SystemsGowallanDCG@200.1605RLAE-DAN
Recommendation SystemsYelp2018NDCG@200.0587RLAE-DAN
Recommendation SystemsYelp2018Recall@200.0706RLAE-DAN
Recommendation SystemsAmazon-BookRecall@200.0762RLAE-DAN
Recommendation SystemsAmazon-BooknDCG@200.063RLAE-DAN
Collaborative FilteringGowallaNDCG@200.1605RLAE-DAN
Collaborative FilteringGowallaRecall@200.1922RLAE-DAN
Collaborative FilteringYelp2018NDCG@200.0587RLAE-DAN
Collaborative FilteringYelp2018Recall@200.0706RLAE-DAN
Collaborative FilteringAmazon-BookNDCG@200.063RLAE-DAN
Collaborative FilteringAmazon-BookRecall@200.0762RLAE-DAN

Related Papers

IP2: Entity-Guided Interest Probing for Personalized News Recommendation2025-07-18A Reproducibility Study of Product-side Fairness in Bundle Recommendation2025-07-18SGCL: Unifying Self-Supervised and Supervised Learning for Graph Recommendation2025-07-17Similarity-Guided Diffusion for Contrastive Sequential Recommendation2025-07-16Looking for Fairness in Recommender Systems2025-07-16Journalism-Guided Agentic In-Context Learning for News Stance Detection2025-07-15LLM-Stackelberg Games: Conjectural Reasoning Equilibria and Their Applications to Spearphishing2025-07-12NLGCL: Naturally Existing Neighbor Layers Graph Contrastive Learning for Recommendation2025-07-10