TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Neural Architecture Optimization

Neural Architecture Optimization

Renqian Luo, Fei Tian, Tao Qin, Enhong Chen, Tie-Yan Liu

2018-08-22NeurIPS 2018 12Image ClassificationReinforcement LearningNeural Architecture SearchGeneral ClassificationLanguage Modelling
PaperPDFCodeCode(official)CodeCode(official)Code

Abstract

Automatic neural architecture design has shown its potential in discovering powerful neural network architectures. Existing methods, no matter based on reinforcement learning or evolutionary algorithms (EA), conduct architecture search in a discrete space, which is highly inefficient. In this paper, we propose a simple and efficient method to automatic neural architecture design based on continuous optimization. We call this new approach neural architecture optimization (NAO). There are three key components in our proposed approach: (1) An encoder embeds/maps neural network architectures into a continuous space. (2) A predictor takes the continuous representation of a network as input and predicts its accuracy. (3) A decoder maps a continuous representation of a network back to its architecture. The performance predictor and the encoder enable us to perform gradient based optimization in the continuous space to find the embedding of a new architecture with potentially better accuracy. Such a better embedding is then decoded to a network by the decoder. Experiments show that the architecture discovered by our method is very competitive for image classification task on CIFAR-10 and language modeling task on PTB, outperforming or on par with the best results of previous architecture search methods with a significantly reduction of computational resources. Specifically we obtain 1.93% test set error rate for CIFAR-10 image classification task and 56.0 test set perplexity of PTB language modeling task. Furthermore, combined with the recent proposed weight sharing mechanism, we discover powerful architecture on CIFAR-10 (with error rate 2.93%) and on PTB (with test set perplexity 56.6), with very limited computational resources (less than 10 GPU hours) for both tasks.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Neural Architecture SearchCIFAR-10 Image ClassificationPercentage error1.93NAONet + c/o
AutoMLCIFAR-10 Image ClassificationPercentage error1.93NAONet + c/o

Related Papers

Visual-Language Model Knowledge Distillation Method for Image Quality Assessment2025-07-21Automatic Classification and Segmentation of Tunnel Cracks Based on Deep Learning and Visual Explanations2025-07-18CUDA-L1: Improving CUDA Optimization via Contrastive Reinforcement Learning2025-07-18Adversarial attacks to image classification systems using evolutionary algorithms2025-07-17Efficient Adaptation of Pre-trained Vision Transformer underpinned by Approximately Orthogonal Fine-Tuning Strategy2025-07-17Federated Learning for Commercial Image Sources2025-07-17MUPAX: Multidimensional Problem Agnostic eXplainable AI2025-07-17VisionThink: Smart and Efficient Vision Language Model via Reinforcement Learning2025-07-17