TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Residual Transformer Fusion Network for Salt and Pepper Im...

Residual Transformer Fusion Network for Salt and Pepper Image Denoising

Bintang Pradana Erlangga Putra, Heri Prasetyo, Esti Suryani

2025-02-13DenoisingImage DenoisingImage Reconstruction
PaperPDF

Abstract

Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) has been widely used in unstructured datasets, one of which is image denoising. Image denoising is a noisy image reconstruction process that aims to reduce additional noise that occurs from the noisy image with various strategies. Image denoising has a problem, namely that some image denoising methods require some prior knowledge of information about noise. To overcome this problem, a combined architecture of Convolutional Vision Transformer (CvT) and Residual Networks (ResNet) is used which is called the Residual Transformer Fusion Network (RTF-Net). In general, the process in this architecture can be divided into two parts, Noise Suppression Network (NSN) and Structure Enhancement Network (SEN). Residual Block is used in the Noise Suppression Network and is used to learn the noise map in the image, while the CvT is used in the Structure Enhancement Network and is used to learn the details that need to be added to the image processed by the Noise Suppression Network. The model was trained using the DIV2K Training Set dataset, and validation using the DIV2K Validation Set. After doing the training, the model was tested using Lena, Bridge, Pepper, and BSD300 images with noise levels ranging from 30%, 50%, and 70% and the PSNR results were compared with the DBA, NASNLM, PARIGI, NLSF, NLSF-MLP and NLSF-CNN methods. The test results show that the proposed method is superior in all cases except for Pepper's image with a noise level of 30%, where NLSF-CNN is superior with a PSNR value of 32.99 dB, while the proposed method gets a PSNR value of 31.70 dB.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
DenoisingBSD300 Noise Level 30%PSNR44.56RTF-Net
DenoisingBSD300 Noise Level 50%PSNR38.03RTF-Net
DenoisingBSD300 Noise Level 70%PSNR34.96RTF-Net
3D ArchitectureBSD300 Noise Level 30%PSNR44.56RTF-Net
3D ArchitectureBSD300 Noise Level 50%PSNR38.03RTF-Net
3D ArchitectureBSD300 Noise Level 70%PSNR34.96RTF-Net

Related Papers

fastWDM3D: Fast and Accurate 3D Healthy Tissue Inpainting2025-07-17Diffuman4D: 4D Consistent Human View Synthesis from Sparse-View Videos with Spatio-Temporal Diffusion Models2025-07-17Similarity-Guided Diffusion for Contrastive Sequential Recommendation2025-07-16HUG-VAS: A Hierarchical NURBS-Based Generative Model for Aortic Geometry Synthesis and Controllable Editing2025-07-15AirLLM: Diffusion Policy-based Adaptive LoRA for Remote Fine-Tuning of LLM over the Air2025-07-15The model is the message: Lightweight convolutional autoencoders applied to noisy imaging data for planetary science and astrobiology2025-07-153D Magnetic Inverse Routine for Single-Segment Magnetic Field Images2025-07-15MGVQ: Could VQ-VAE Beat VAE? A Generalizable Tokenizer with Multi-group Quantization2025-07-14