TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/ANDHRA Bandersnatch: Training Neural Networks to Predict P...

ANDHRA Bandersnatch: Training Neural Networks to Predict Parallel Realities

Venkata Satya Sai Ajay Daliparthi

2024-11-28Image Classification
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

Inspired by the Many-Worlds Interpretation (MWI), this work introduces a novel neural network architecture that splits the same input signal into parallel branches at each layer, utilizing a Hyper Rectified Activation, referred to as ANDHRA. The branched layers do not merge and form separate network paths, leading to multiple network heads for output prediction. For a network with a branching factor of 2 at three levels, the total number of heads is 2^3 = 8 . The individual heads are jointly trained by combining their respective loss values. However, the proposed architecture requires additional parameters and memory during training due to the additional branches. During inference, the experimental results on CIFAR-10/100 demonstrate that there exists one individual head that outperforms the baseline accuracy, achieving statistically significant improvement with equal parameters and computational cost.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10Percentage correct96.378ABNet-2G-R3-Combined
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10Percentage correct96.088ABNet-2G-R3
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10Percentage correct95.9ABNet-2G-R2
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10Percentage correct95.536ABNet-2G-R1
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10Percentage correct94.118ABNet-2G-R0
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100Percentage correct82.784ABNet-2G-R3-Combined
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100Percentage correct80.83ABNet-2G-R3
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100Percentage correct80.354ABNet-2G-R2
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100Percentage correct78.792ABNet-2G-R1
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100Percentage correct73.93ABNet-2G-R0

Related Papers

Automatic Classification and Segmentation of Tunnel Cracks Based on Deep Learning and Visual Explanations2025-07-18Adversarial attacks to image classification systems using evolutionary algorithms2025-07-17Efficient Adaptation of Pre-trained Vision Transformer underpinned by Approximately Orthogonal Fine-Tuning Strategy2025-07-17Federated Learning for Commercial Image Sources2025-07-17MUPAX: Multidimensional Problem Agnostic eXplainable AI2025-07-17Hashed Watermark as a Filter: Defeating Forging and Overwriting Attacks in Weight-based Neural Network Watermarking2025-07-15Transferring Styles for Reduced Texture Bias and Improved Robustness in Semantic Segmentation Networks2025-07-14FedGSCA: Medical Federated Learning with Global Sample Selector and Client Adaptive Adjuster under Label Noise2025-07-13