TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/A Comparison of Deep Learning and Established Methods for ...

A Comparison of Deep Learning and Established Methods for Calf Behaviour Monitoring

Oshana Dissanayake, Lucile Riaboff, Sarah E. McPherson, Emer Kennedy, Pádraig Cunningham

2024-08-23Human Activity RecognitionTime SeriesTime Series ClassificationActivity Recognition
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

In recent years, there has been considerable progress in research on human activity recognition using data from wearable sensors. This technology also has potential in the context of animal welfare in livestock science. In this paper, we report on research on animal activity recognition in support of welfare monitoring. The data comes from collar-mounted accelerometer sensors worn by Holstein and Jersey calves, the objective being to detect changes in behaviour indicating sickness or stress. A key requirement in detecting changes in behaviour is to be able to classify activities into classes, such as drinking, running or walking. In Machine Learning terms, this is a time-series classification task, and in recent years, the Rocket family of methods have emerged as the state-of-the-art in this area. We have over 27 hours of labelled time-series data from 30 calves for our analysis. Using this data as a baseline, we present Rocket's performance on a 6-class classification task. Then, we compare this against the performance of 11 Deep Learning (DL) methods that have been proposed as promising methods for time-series classification. Given the success of DL in related areas, it is reasonable to expect that these methods will perform well here as well. Surprisingly, despite taking care to ensure that the DL methods are configured correctly, none of them match Rocket's performance. A possible explanation for the impressive success of Rocket is that it has the data encoding benefits of DL models in a much simpler classification framework.

Related Papers

MoTM: Towards a Foundation Model for Time Series Imputation based on Continuous Modeling2025-07-17The Power of Architecture: Deep Dive into Transformer Architectures for Long-Term Time Series Forecasting2025-07-17ZKP-FedEval: Verifiable and Privacy-Preserving Federated Evaluation using Zero-Knowledge Proofs2025-07-15Data Augmentation in Time Series Forecasting through Inverted Framework2025-07-15D3FL: Data Distribution and Detrending for Robust Federated Learning in Non-linear Time-series Data2025-07-15Towards Interpretable Time Series Foundation Models2025-07-10MoFE-Time: Mixture of Frequency Domain Experts for Time-Series Forecasting Models2025-07-09Foundation models for time series forecasting: Application in conformal prediction2025-07-09