TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Towards Efficient Pixel Labeling for Industrial Anomaly De...

Towards Efficient Pixel Labeling for Industrial Anomaly Detection and Localization

Hanxi Li, Jingqi Wu, Lin Yuanbo Wu, Hao Chen, Deyin Liu, Chunhua Shen

2024-07-03Anomaly DetectionSemantic SegmentationSupervised Anomaly DetectionImage Segmentation
PaperPDF

Abstract

In the realm of practical Anomaly Detection (AD) tasks, manual labeling of anomalous pixels proves to be a costly endeavor. Consequently, many AD methods are crafted as one-class classifiers, tailored for training sets completely devoid of anomalies, ensuring a more cost-effective approach. While some pioneering work has demonstrated heightened AD accuracy by incorporating real anomaly samples in training, this enhancement comes at the price of labor-intensive labeling processes. This paper strikes the balance between AD accuracy and labeling expenses by introducing ADClick, a novel Interactive Image Segmentation (IIS) algorithm. ADClick efficiently generates "ground-truth" anomaly masks for real defective images, leveraging innovative residual features and meticulously crafted language prompts. Notably, ADClick showcases a significantly elevated generalization capacity compared to existing state-of-the-art IIS approaches. Functioning as an anomaly labeling tool, ADClick generates high-quality anomaly labels (AP $= 94.1\%$ on MVTec AD) based on only $3$ to $5$ manual click annotations per training image. Furthermore, we extend the capabilities of ADClick into ADClick-Seg, an enhanced model designed for anomaly detection and localization. By fine-tuning the ADClick-Seg model using the weak labels inferred by ADClick, we establish the state-of-the-art performances in supervised AD tasks (AP $= 86.4\%$ on MVTec AD and AP $= 78.4\%$, PRO $= 98.6\%$ on KSDD2).

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Anomaly DetectionMVTec ADDetection AUROC99.7ADClick
Anomaly DetectionMVTec ADSegmentation AP82.9ADClick
Anomaly DetectionMVTec ADSegmentation AUPRO97.8ADClick
Anomaly DetectionMVTec ADSegmentation AUROC99.2ADClick
Anomaly DetectionMVTec ADDetection AUROC99.6ADClick
Anomaly DetectionMVTec ADSegmentation AP86.4ADClick
Anomaly DetectionMVTec ADSegmentation AUPRO98.2ADClick
Anomaly DetectionMVTec ADSegmentation AUROC99.6ADClick

Related Papers

Multi-Stage Prompt Inference Attacks on Enterprise LLM Systems2025-07-21SeC: Advancing Complex Video Object Segmentation via Progressive Concept Construction2025-07-213DKeyAD: High-Resolution 3D Point Cloud Anomaly Detection via Keypoint-Guided Point Clustering2025-07-17A Semi-Supervised Learning Method for the Identification of Bad Exposures in Large Imaging Surveys2025-07-17DiffOSeg: Omni Medical Image Segmentation via Multi-Expert Collaboration Diffusion Model2025-07-17SCORE: Scene Context Matters in Open-Vocabulary Remote Sensing Instance Segmentation2025-07-17Unified Medical Image Segmentation with State Space Modeling Snake2025-07-17A Privacy-Preserving Semantic-Segmentation Method Using Domain-Adaptation Technique2025-07-17