TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/PANDA: Expanded Width-Aware Message Passing Beyond Rewiring

PANDA: Expanded Width-Aware Message Passing Beyond Rewiring

Jeongwhan Choi, Sumin Park, Hyowon Wi, Sung-Bae Cho, Noseong Park

2024-06-06Graph RegressionGraph ClassificationNode Classification
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

Recent research in the field of graph neural network (GNN) has identified a critical issue known as "over-squashing," resulting from the bottleneck phenomenon in graph structures, which impedes the propagation of long-range information. Prior works have proposed a variety of graph rewiring concepts that aim at optimizing the spatial or spectral properties of graphs to promote the signal propagation. However, such approaches inevitably deteriorate the original graph topology, which may lead to a distortion of information flow. To address this, we introduce an expanded width-aware (PANDA) message passing, a new message passing paradigm where nodes with high centrality, a potential source of over-squashing, are selectively expanded in width to encapsulate the growing influx of signals from distant nodes. Experimental results show that our method outperforms existing rewiring methods, suggesting that selectively expanding the hidden state of nodes can be a compelling alternative to graph rewiring for addressing the over-squashing.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Graph ClassificationIMDB-BINARYAccuracy72.56GIN + PANDA
Graph ClassificationIMDB-BINARYAccuracy72.09R-GIN + PANDA
Graph ClassificationIMDB-BINARYAccuracy66.79R-GCN + PANDA
Graph ClassificationIMDB-BINARYAccuracy63.76GCN + PANDA
Graph ClassificationPROTEINSAccuracy76.17R-GIN + PANDA
Graph ClassificationPROTEINSAccuracy76GCN + PANDA
Graph ClassificationPROTEINSAccuracy76R-GCN + PANDA
Graph ClassificationPROTEINSAccuracy75.759GIN + PANDA
Graph ClassificationREDDIT-BINARYAccuracy91.36R-GIN + PANDA
Graph ClassificationREDDIT-BINARYAccuracy91.055GIN + PANDA
Graph ClassificationREDDIT-BINARYAccuracy80.69GCN + PANDA
Graph ClassificationREDDIT-BINARYAccuracy80.2R-GCN + PANDA
Graph ClassificationENZYMESAccuracy53.1R-GIN + PANDA
Graph ClassificationENZYMESAccuracy46.2GIN + PANDA
Graph ClassificationENZYMESAccuracy43.9R-GCN + PANDA
Graph ClassificationENZYMESAccuracy31.55GCN + PANDA
ClassificationIMDB-BINARYAccuracy72.56GIN + PANDA
ClassificationIMDB-BINARYAccuracy72.09R-GIN + PANDA
ClassificationIMDB-BINARYAccuracy66.79R-GCN + PANDA
ClassificationIMDB-BINARYAccuracy63.76GCN + PANDA
ClassificationPROTEINSAccuracy76.17R-GIN + PANDA
ClassificationPROTEINSAccuracy76GCN + PANDA
ClassificationPROTEINSAccuracy76R-GCN + PANDA
ClassificationPROTEINSAccuracy75.759GIN + PANDA
ClassificationREDDIT-BINARYAccuracy91.36R-GIN + PANDA
ClassificationREDDIT-BINARYAccuracy91.055GIN + PANDA
ClassificationREDDIT-BINARYAccuracy80.69GCN + PANDA
ClassificationREDDIT-BINARYAccuracy80.2R-GCN + PANDA
ClassificationENZYMESAccuracy53.1R-GIN + PANDA
ClassificationENZYMESAccuracy46.2GIN + PANDA
ClassificationENZYMESAccuracy43.9R-GCN + PANDA
ClassificationENZYMESAccuracy31.55GCN + PANDA

Related Papers

Demystifying Distributed Training of Graph Neural Networks for Link Prediction2025-06-25Equivariance Everywhere All At Once: A Recipe for Graph Foundation Models2025-06-17Density-aware Walks for Coordinated Campaign Detection2025-06-16Delving into Instance-Dependent Label Noise in Graph Data: A Comprehensive Study and Benchmark2025-06-14Graph Semi-Supervised Learning for Point Classification on Data Manifolds2025-06-13Devil's Hand: Data Poisoning Attacks to Locally Private Graph Learning Protocols2025-06-11Wasserstein Hypergraph Neural Network2025-06-11Positional Encoding meets Persistent Homology on Graphs2025-06-06