TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Are you sure it’s an artifact? Artifact detection and unce...

Are you sure it’s an artifact? Artifact detection and uncertainty quantification in histological images

Neel Kanwal, Miguel López-Pérez, Umay Kiraz, Tahlita C.M. Zuiverloon, Rafael Molina, Kjersti Engan

2023-12-23Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 2023 12Artifact DetectionUncertainty QuantificationDefocus Blur DetectionGaussian ProcessesAnomaly DetectionTransfer LearningDiagnostic
PaperPDFCode

Abstract

Modern cancer diagnostics involves extracting tissue specimens from suspicious areas and conducting histotechnical procedures to prepare a digitized glass slide, called Whole Slide Image (WSI), for further examination. These procedures frequently introduce different types of artifacts in the obtained WSI, and histological artifacts might influence Computational Pathology (CPATH) systems further down to a diagnostic pipeline if not excluded or handled. Deep Convolutional Neural Networks (DCNNs) have achieved promising results for the detection of some WSI artifacts, however, they do not incorporate uncertainty in their predictions. This paper proposes an uncertainty-aware Deep Kernel Learning (DKL) model to detect blurry areas and folded tissues, two types of artifacts that can appear in WSIs. The proposed probabilistic model combines a CNN feature extractor and a sparse Gaussian Processes (GPs) classifier, which improves the performance of current state-of-the-art artifact detection DCNNs and provides uncertainty estimates. We achieved 0.996 and 0.938 F1 scores for blur and folded tissue detection on unseen data, respectively. In extensive experiments, we validated the DKL model on unseen data from external independent cohorts with different staining and tissue types, where it outperformed DCNNs. Interestingly, the DKL model is more confident in the correct predictions and less in the wrong ones. The proposed DKL model can be integrated into the preprocessing pipeline of CPATH systems to provide reliable predictions and possibly serve as a quality control tool.

Related Papers

Multi-Stage Prompt Inference Attacks on Enterprise LLM Systems2025-07-21RaMen: Multi-Strategy Multi-Modal Learning for Bundle Construction2025-07-18Smart fault detection in satellite electrical power system2025-07-183DKeyAD: High-Resolution 3D Point Cloud Anomaly Detection via Keypoint-Guided Point Clustering2025-07-17A Semi-Supervised Learning Method for the Identification of Bad Exposures in Large Imaging Surveys2025-07-17Disentangling coincident cell events using deep transfer learning and compressive sensing2025-07-17Demographic-aware fine-grained classification of pediatric wrist fractures2025-07-17Distributional Reinforcement Learning on Path-dependent Options2025-07-16