TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Equipping Computational Pathology Systems with Artifact Pr...

Equipping Computational Pathology Systems with Artifact Processing Pipelines: A Showcase for Computation and Performance Trade-offs

Neel Kanwal, Farbod Khoraminia, Umay Kiraz, Andres Mosquera-Zamudio, Carlos Monteagudo, Emiel A. M. Janssen, Tahlita C. M. Zuiverloon, Chunmig Rong, Kjersti Engan

2024-03-12Artifact DetectionBlood DetectionDefocus Blur DetectionEnsemble Learningwhole slide imagesAnomaly Detection
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

Histopathology is a gold standard for cancer diagnosis under a microscopic examination. However, histological tissue processing procedures result in artifacts, which are ultimately transferred to the digitized version of glass slides, known as whole slide images (WSIs). Artifacts are diagnostically irrelevant areas and may result in wrong deep learning (DL) algorithms predictions. Therefore, detecting and excluding artifacts in the computational pathology (CPATH) system is essential for reliable automated diagnosis. In this paper, we propose a mixture of experts (MoE) scheme for detecting five notable artifacts, including damaged tissue, blur, folded tissue, air bubbles, and histologically irrelevant blood from WSIs. First, we train independent binary DL models as experts to capture particular artifact morphology. Then, we ensemble their predictions using a fusion mechanism. We apply probabilistic thresholding over the final probability distribution to improve the sensitivity of the MoE. We developed DL pipelines using two MoEs and two multiclass models of state-of-the-art deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) and vision transformers (ViTs). DCNNs-based MoE and ViTs-based MoE schemes outperformed simpler multiclass models and were tested on datasets from different hospitals and cancer types, where MoE using DCNNs yielded the best results. The proposed MoE yields 86.15% F1 and 97.93% sensitivity scores on unseen data, retaining less computational cost for inference than MoE using ViTs. This best performance of MoEs comes with relatively higher computational trade-offs than multiclass models. The proposed artifact detection pipeline will not only ensure reliable CPATH predictions but may also provide quality control.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Anomaly DetectionHistoArtifacts1:1 Accuracy97.82DCNN-based MoE
Anomaly DetectionHistoArtifactsAvg F186.15DCNN-based MoE
Anomaly DetectionHistoArtifactsRecall/ Sensitivity97.93DCNN-based MoE
3D Anomaly DetectionHistoArtifacts1:1 Accuracy97.82DCNN-based MoE
3D Anomaly DetectionHistoArtifactsAvg F186.15DCNN-based MoE
3D Anomaly DetectionHistoArtifactsRecall/ Sensitivity97.93DCNN-based MoE

Related Papers

Multi-Stage Prompt Inference Attacks on Enterprise LLM Systems2025-07-21Simulate, Refocus and Ensemble: An Attention-Refocusing Scheme for Domain Generalization2025-07-173DKeyAD: High-Resolution 3D Point Cloud Anomaly Detection via Keypoint-Guided Point Clustering2025-07-17A Semi-Supervised Learning Method for the Identification of Bad Exposures in Large Imaging Surveys2025-07-17A Privacy-Preserving Framework for Advertising Personalization Incorporating Federated Learning and Differential Privacy2025-07-16Bridge Feature Matching and Cross-Modal Alignment with Mutual-filtering for Zero-shot Anomaly Detection2025-07-15Adversarial Activation Patching: A Framework for Detecting and Mitigating Emergent Deception in Safety-Aligned Transformers2025-07-12Towards High-Resolution 3D Anomaly Detection: A Scalable Dataset and Real-Time Framework for Subtle Industrial Defects2025-07-10