Huaxin Zhang, Xiang Wang, Xiaohao Xu, Zhiwu Qing, Changxin Gao, Nong Sang
Point-supervised Temporal Action Localization (PSTAL) is an emerging research direction for label-efficient learning. However, current methods mainly focus on optimizing the network either at the snippet-level or the instance-level, neglecting the inherent reliability of point annotations at both levels. In this paper, we propose a Hierarchical Reliability Propagation (HR-Pro) framework, which consists of two reliability-aware stages: Snippet-level Discrimination Learning and Instance-level Completeness Learning, both stages explore the efficient propagation of high-confidence cues in point annotations. For snippet-level learning, we introduce an online-updated memory to store reliable snippet prototypes for each class. We then employ a Reliability-aware Attention Block to capture both intra-video and inter-video dependencies of snippets, resulting in more discriminative and robust snippet representation. For instance-level learning, we propose a point-based proposal generation approach as a means of connecting snippets and instances, which produces high-confidence proposals for further optimization at the instance level. Through multi-level reliability-aware learning, we obtain more reliable confidence scores and more accurate temporal boundaries of predicted proposals. Our HR-Pro achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple challenging benchmarks, including an impressive average mAP of 60.3% on THUMOS14. Notably, our HR-Pro largely surpasses all previous point-supervised methods, and even outperforms several competitive fully supervised methods. Code will be available at https://github.com/pipixin321/HR-Pro.
| Task | Dataset | Metric | Value | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video | GTEA | mAP@0.1:0.7 | 47.3 | HR-Pro |
| Video | GTEA | mAP@0.5 | 37.3 | HR-Pro |
| Video | BEOID | mAP@0.1:0.7 | 59.4 | HR-Pro |
| Video | BEOID | mAP@0.5 | 55.3 | HR-Pro |
| Video | THUMOS 2014 | mAP@0.1:0.5 | 71.6 | HR-Pro |
| Video | THUMOS 2014 | mAP@0.1:0.7 | 60.3 | HR-Pro |
| Video | THUMOS 2014 | mAP@0.5 | 52.2 | HR-Pro |
| Video | THUMOS14 | avg-mAP (0.1-0.5) | 71.6 | HR-Pro |
| Video | THUMOS14 | avg-mAP (0.1:0.7) | 60.3 | HR-Pro |
| Video | THUMOS14 | avg-mAP (0.3-0.7) | 51.1 | HR-Pro |
| Temporal Action Localization | GTEA | mAP@0.1:0.7 | 47.3 | HR-Pro |
| Temporal Action Localization | GTEA | mAP@0.5 | 37.3 | HR-Pro |
| Temporal Action Localization | BEOID | mAP@0.1:0.7 | 59.4 | HR-Pro |
| Temporal Action Localization | BEOID | mAP@0.5 | 55.3 | HR-Pro |
| Temporal Action Localization | THUMOS 2014 | mAP@0.1:0.5 | 71.6 | HR-Pro |
| Temporal Action Localization | THUMOS 2014 | mAP@0.1:0.7 | 60.3 | HR-Pro |
| Temporal Action Localization | THUMOS 2014 | mAP@0.5 | 52.2 | HR-Pro |
| Temporal Action Localization | THUMOS14 | avg-mAP (0.1-0.5) | 71.6 | HR-Pro |
| Temporal Action Localization | THUMOS14 | avg-mAP (0.1:0.7) | 60.3 | HR-Pro |
| Temporal Action Localization | THUMOS14 | avg-mAP (0.3-0.7) | 51.1 | HR-Pro |
| Zero-Shot Learning | GTEA | mAP@0.1:0.7 | 47.3 | HR-Pro |
| Zero-Shot Learning | GTEA | mAP@0.5 | 37.3 | HR-Pro |
| Zero-Shot Learning | BEOID | mAP@0.1:0.7 | 59.4 | HR-Pro |
| Zero-Shot Learning | BEOID | mAP@0.5 | 55.3 | HR-Pro |
| Zero-Shot Learning | THUMOS 2014 | mAP@0.1:0.5 | 71.6 | HR-Pro |
| Zero-Shot Learning | THUMOS 2014 | mAP@0.1:0.7 | 60.3 | HR-Pro |
| Zero-Shot Learning | THUMOS 2014 | mAP@0.5 | 52.2 | HR-Pro |
| Zero-Shot Learning | THUMOS14 | avg-mAP (0.1-0.5) | 71.6 | HR-Pro |
| Zero-Shot Learning | THUMOS14 | avg-mAP (0.1:0.7) | 60.3 | HR-Pro |
| Zero-Shot Learning | THUMOS14 | avg-mAP (0.3-0.7) | 51.1 | HR-Pro |
| Action Localization | GTEA | mAP@0.1:0.7 | 47.3 | HR-Pro |
| Action Localization | GTEA | mAP@0.5 | 37.3 | HR-Pro |
| Action Localization | BEOID | mAP@0.1:0.7 | 59.4 | HR-Pro |
| Action Localization | BEOID | mAP@0.5 | 55.3 | HR-Pro |
| Action Localization | THUMOS 2014 | mAP@0.1:0.5 | 71.6 | HR-Pro |
| Action Localization | THUMOS 2014 | mAP@0.1:0.7 | 60.3 | HR-Pro |
| Action Localization | THUMOS 2014 | mAP@0.5 | 52.2 | HR-Pro |
| Action Localization | THUMOS14 | avg-mAP (0.1-0.5) | 71.6 | HR-Pro |
| Action Localization | THUMOS14 | avg-mAP (0.1:0.7) | 60.3 | HR-Pro |
| Action Localization | THUMOS14 | avg-mAP (0.3-0.7) | 51.1 | HR-Pro |
| Weakly Supervised Action Localization | GTEA | mAP@0.1:0.7 | 47.3 | HR-Pro |
| Weakly Supervised Action Localization | GTEA | mAP@0.5 | 37.3 | HR-Pro |
| Weakly Supervised Action Localization | BEOID | mAP@0.1:0.7 | 59.4 | HR-Pro |
| Weakly Supervised Action Localization | BEOID | mAP@0.5 | 55.3 | HR-Pro |
| Weakly Supervised Action Localization | THUMOS 2014 | mAP@0.1:0.5 | 71.6 | HR-Pro |
| Weakly Supervised Action Localization | THUMOS 2014 | mAP@0.1:0.7 | 60.3 | HR-Pro |
| Weakly Supervised Action Localization | THUMOS 2014 | mAP@0.5 | 52.2 | HR-Pro |
| Weakly Supervised Action Localization | THUMOS14 | avg-mAP (0.1-0.5) | 71.6 | HR-Pro |
| Weakly Supervised Action Localization | THUMOS14 | avg-mAP (0.1:0.7) | 60.3 | HR-Pro |
| Weakly Supervised Action Localization | THUMOS14 | avg-mAP (0.3-0.7) | 51.1 | HR-Pro |