TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Mitigating Hallucination in Large Multi-Modal Models via R...

Mitigating Hallucination in Large Multi-Modal Models via Robust Instruction Tuning

Fuxiao Liu, Kevin Lin, Linjie Li, JianFeng Wang, Yaser Yacoob, Lijuan Wang

2023-06-26HallucinationVisual Question Answering (VQA)Visual Question Answering
PaperPDFCodeCodeCodeCode(official)

Abstract

Despite the promising progress in multi-modal tasks, current large multi-modal models (LMMs) are prone to hallucinating inconsistent descriptions with respect to the associated image and human instructions. This paper addresses this issue by introducing the first large and diverse visual instruction tuning dataset, named Large-scale Robust Visual (LRV)-Instruction. Our dataset comprises 400k visual instructions generated by GPT4, covering 16 vision-and-language tasks with open-ended instructions and answers. Unlike existing studies that primarily focus on positive instruction samples, we design LRV-Instruction to include both positive and negative instructions for more robust visual instruction tuning. Our negative instructions are designed at three semantic levels: (i) Nonexistent Object Manipulation, (ii) Existent Object Manipulation and (iii) Knowledge Manipulation. To efficiently measure the hallucination generated by LMMs, we propose GPT4-Assisted Visual Instruction Evaluation (GAVIE), a stable approach to evaluate visual instruction tuning like human experts. GAVIE does not require human-annotated groundtruth answers and can adapt to diverse instruction formats. We conduct comprehensive experiments to investigate the hallucination of LMMs. Our results demonstrate existing LMMs exhibit significant hallucinations when presented with our negative instructions, particularly Existent Object and Knowledge Manipulation instructions. Moreover, we successfully mitigate hallucination by finetuning MiniGPT4 and mPLUG-Owl on LRV-Instruction while improving performance on several public datasets compared to state-of-the-art methods. Additionally, we observed that a balanced ratio of positive and negative instances in the training data leads to a more robust model. Code and data are available at https://github.com/FuxiaoLiu/LRV-Instruction.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Visual Question Answering (VQA)HallusionBenchQuestion Pair Acc 1.57LRV-Instruct

Related Papers

VisionThink: Smart and Efficient Vision Language Model via Reinforcement Learning2025-07-17Mitigating Object Hallucinations via Sentence-Level Early Intervention2025-07-16MGFFD-VLM: Multi-Granularity Prompt Learning for Face Forgery Detection with VLM2025-07-16Describe Anything Model for Visual Question Answering on Text-rich Images2025-07-16ByDeWay: Boost Your multimodal LLM with DEpth prompting in a Training-Free Way2025-07-11Evaluating Attribute Confusion in Fashion Text-to-Image Generation2025-07-09LinguaMark: Do Multimodal Models Speak Fairly? A Benchmark-Based Evaluation2025-07-09Barriers in Integrating Medical Visual Question Answering into Radiology Workflows: A Scoping Review and Clinicians' Insights2025-07-09