TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Topic-Guided Sampling For Data-Efficient Multi-Domain Stan...

Topic-Guided Sampling For Data-Efficient Multi-Domain Stance Detection

Erik Arakelyan, Arnav Arora, Isabelle Augenstein

2023-06-01Contrastive LearningStance DetectionDomain Adaptation
PaperPDFCodeCode(official)

Abstract

Stance Detection is concerned with identifying the attitudes expressed by an author towards a target of interest. This task spans a variety of domains ranging from social media opinion identification to detecting the stance for a legal claim. However, the framing of the task varies within these domains, in terms of the data collection protocol, the label dictionary and the number of available annotations. Furthermore, these stance annotations are significantly imbalanced on a per-topic and inter-topic basis. These make multi-domain stance detection a challenging task, requiring standardization and domain adaptation. To overcome this challenge, we propose $\textbf{T}$opic $\textbf{E}$fficient $\textbf{St}$anc$\textbf{E}$ $\textbf{D}$etection (TESTED), consisting of a topic-guided diversity sampling technique and a contrastive objective that is used for fine-tuning a stance classifier. We evaluate the method on an existing benchmark of $16$ datasets with in-domain, i.e. all topics seen and out-of-domain, i.e. unseen topics, experiments. The results show that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art with an average of $3.5$ F1 points increase in-domain, and is more generalizable with an averaged increase of $10.2$ F1 on out-of-domain evaluation while using $\leq10\%$ of the training data. We show that our sampling technique mitigates both inter- and per-topic class imbalances. Finally, our analysis demonstrates that the contrastive learning objective allows the model a more pronounced segmentation of samples with varying labels.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Stance Detectioniac1F156.97TESTED
Stance DetectionPerspectrumF183.11TESTED
Stance DetectionSemEval 2019F158.72TESTED
Stance DetectionmtsdF163.96TESTED
Stance DetectionRumourEvalF166.58TESTED
Stance DetectionwtwtF170.98TESTED
Stance DetectionpoldebF152.76TESTED
Stance DetectionibmcsF188.06TESTED
Stance DetectionVASTF157.47TESTED
Stance DetectionARC (AI2 Reasoning Challenge)F164.82TESTED
Stance DetectionSnopesF178.61TESTED
Stance DetectionSCDF164.71TESTED
Stance DetectionargminF162.79TESTED
Stance DetectionemergentF182.1TESTED
Stance DetectionFNC-1F183.17TESTED

Related Papers

SemCSE: Semantic Contrastive Sentence Embeddings Using LLM-Generated Summaries For Scientific Abstracts2025-07-17HapticCap: A Multimodal Dataset and Task for Understanding User Experience of Vibration Haptic Signals2025-07-17Overview of the TalentCLEF 2025: Skill and Job Title Intelligence for Human Capital Management2025-07-17SGCL: Unifying Self-Supervised and Supervised Learning for Graph Recommendation2025-07-17A Privacy-Preserving Semantic-Segmentation Method Using Domain-Adaptation Technique2025-07-17Similarity-Guided Diffusion for Contrastive Sequential Recommendation2025-07-16LLM-Driven Dual-Level Multi-Interest Modeling for Recommendation2025-07-15Latent Space Consistency for Sparse-View CT Reconstruction2025-07-15