TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Offline RL with No OOD Actions: In-Sample Learning via Imp...

Offline RL with No OOD Actions: In-Sample Learning via Implicit Value Regularization

Haoran Xu, Li Jiang, Jianxiong Li, Zhuoran Yang, Zhaoran Wang, Victor Wai Kin Chan, Xianyuan Zhan

2023-03-28Reinforcement LearningOffline RLD4RLQ-Learning
PaperPDFCodeCodeCodeCode(official)

Abstract

Most offline reinforcement learning (RL) methods suffer from the trade-off between improving the policy to surpass the behavior policy and constraining the policy to limit the deviation from the behavior policy as computing $Q$-values using out-of-distribution (OOD) actions will suffer from errors due to distributional shift. The recently proposed \textit{In-sample Learning} paradigm (i.e., IQL), which improves the policy by quantile regression using only data samples, shows great promise because it learns an optimal policy without querying the value function of any unseen actions. However, it remains unclear how this type of method handles the distributional shift in learning the value function. In this work, we make a key finding that the in-sample learning paradigm arises under the \textit{Implicit Value Regularization} (IVR) framework. This gives a deeper understanding of why the in-sample learning paradigm works, i.e., it applies implicit value regularization to the policy. Based on the IVR framework, we further propose two practical algorithms, Sparse $Q$-learning (SQL) and Exponential $Q$-learning (EQL), which adopt the same value regularization used in existing works, but in a complete in-sample manner. Compared with IQL, we find that our algorithms introduce sparsity in learning the value function, making them more robust in noisy data regimes. We also verify the effectiveness of SQL and EQL on D4RL benchmark datasets and show the benefits of in-sample learning by comparing them with CQL in small data regimes.

Related Papers

CUDA-L1: Improving CUDA Optimization via Contrastive Reinforcement Learning2025-07-18VisionThink: Smart and Efficient Vision Language Model via Reinforcement Learning2025-07-17Spectral Bellman Method: Unifying Representation and Exploration in RL2025-07-17Aligning Humans and Robots via Reinforcement Learning from Implicit Human Feedback2025-07-17VAR-MATH: Probing True Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models via Symbolic Multi-Instance Benchmarks2025-07-17QuestA: Expanding Reasoning Capacity in LLMs via Question Augmentation2025-07-17Inverse Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Model Post-Training: Basics, Advances, and Opportunities2025-07-17Autonomous Resource Management in Microservice Systems via Reinforcement Learning2025-07-17