TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Magnification Invariant Medical Image Analysis: A Comparis...

Magnification Invariant Medical Image Analysis: A Comparison of Convolutional Networks, Vision Transformers, and Token Mixers

Pranav Jeevan, Nikhil Cherian Kurian, Amit Sethi

2023-02-22Breast Cancer Histology Image ClassificationImage ClassificationMedical Image AnalysisDeep Learning
PaperPDF

Abstract

Convolution Neural Networks (CNNs) are widely used in medical image analysis, but their performance degrade when the magnification of testing images differ from the training images. The inability of CNNs to generalize across magnification scales can result in sub-optimal performance on external datasets. This study aims to evaluate the robustness of various deep learning architectures in the analysis of breast cancer histopathological images with varying magnification scales at training and testing stages. Here we explore and compare the performance of multiple deep learning architectures, including CNN-based ResNet and MobileNet, self-attention-based Vision Transformers and Swin Transformers, and token-mixing models, such as FNet, ConvMixer, MLP-Mixer, and WaveMix. The experiments are conducted using the BreakHis dataset, which contains breast cancer histopathological images at varying magnification levels. We show that performance of WaveMix is invariant to the magnification of training and testing data and can provide stable and good classification accuracy. These evaluations are critical in identifying deep learning architectures that can robustly handle changes in magnification scale, ensuring that scale changes across anatomical structures do not disturb the inference results.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
CancerBreakHisAccuracy (%)91.72WaveMixLite-224/10
Image ClassificationBreakHisAverage Test Accuracy over all magnifications91.72WaveMix-224/10
Breast Cancer Histology Image ClassificationBreakHisAccuracy (%)91.72WaveMixLite-224/10

Related Papers

Automatic Classification and Segmentation of Tunnel Cracks Based on Deep Learning and Visual Explanations2025-07-18Adversarial attacks to image classification systems using evolutionary algorithms2025-07-17Efficient Adaptation of Pre-trained Vision Transformer underpinned by Approximately Orthogonal Fine-Tuning Strategy2025-07-17Federated Learning for Commercial Image Sources2025-07-17MUPAX: Multidimensional Problem Agnostic eXplainable AI2025-07-17A Survey of Deep Learning for Geometry Problem Solving2025-07-16Hashed Watermark as a Filter: Defeating Forging and Overwriting Attacks in Weight-based Neural Network Watermarking2025-07-15Transferring Styles for Reduced Texture Bias and Improved Robustness in Semantic Segmentation Networks2025-07-14