TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Learning by Sorting: Self-supervised Learning with Group O...

Learning by Sorting: Self-supervised Learning with Group Ordering Constraints

Nina Shvetsova, Felix Petersen, Anna Kukleva, Bernt Schiele, Hilde Kuehne

2023-01-05ICCV 2023 1Self-Supervised Image ClassificationSelf-Supervised LearningContrastive Learning
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

Contrastive learning has become an important tool in learning representations from unlabeled data mainly relying on the idea of minimizing distance between positive data pairs, e.g., views from the same images, and maximizing distance between negative data pairs, e.g., views from different images. This paper proposes a new variation of the contrastive learning objective, Group Ordering Constraints (GroCo), that leverages the idea of sorting the distances of positive and negative pairs and computing the respective loss based on how many positive pairs have a larger distance than the negative pairs, and thus are not ordered correctly. To this end, the GroCo loss is based on differentiable sorting networks, which enable training with sorting supervision by matching a differentiable permutation matrix, which is produced by sorting a given set of scores, to a respective ground truth permutation matrix. Applying this idea to groupwise pre-ordered inputs of multiple positive and negative pairs allows introducing the GroCo loss with implicit emphasis on strong positives and negatives, leading to better optimization of the local neighborhood. We evaluate the proposed formulation on various self-supervised learning benchmarks and show that it not only leads to improved results compared to vanilla contrastive learning but also shows competitive performance to comparable methods in linear probing and outperforms current methods in k-NN performance.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Image ClassificationImageNetTop 5 Accuracy91.6GroCo (ResNet-50)

Related Papers

A Semi-Supervised Learning Method for the Identification of Bad Exposures in Large Imaging Surveys2025-07-17SemCSE: Semantic Contrastive Sentence Embeddings Using LLM-Generated Summaries For Scientific Abstracts2025-07-17HapticCap: A Multimodal Dataset and Task for Understanding User Experience of Vibration Haptic Signals2025-07-17Overview of the TalentCLEF 2025: Skill and Job Title Intelligence for Human Capital Management2025-07-17SGCL: Unifying Self-Supervised and Supervised Learning for Graph Recommendation2025-07-17Similarity-Guided Diffusion for Contrastive Sequential Recommendation2025-07-16LLM-Driven Dual-Level Multi-Interest Modeling for Recommendation2025-07-15Latent Space Consistency for Sparse-View CT Reconstruction2025-07-15