TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/AER: Auto-Encoder with Regression for Time Series Anomaly ...

AER: Auto-Encoder with Regression for Time Series Anomaly Detection

Lawrence Wong, Dongyu Liu, Laure Berti-Equille, Sarah Alnegheimish, Kalyan Veeramachaneni

2022-12-27BenchmarkingregressionAnomaly DetectionTime Series Anomaly DetectionTime SeriesTime Series Analysis
PaperPDFCodeCodeCode(official)

Abstract

Anomaly detection on time series data is increasingly common across various industrial domains that monitor metrics in order to prevent potential accidents and economic losses. However, a scarcity of labeled data and ambiguous definitions of anomalies can complicate these efforts. Recent unsupervised machine learning methods have made remarkable progress in tackling this problem using either single-timestamp predictions or time series reconstructions. While traditionally considered separately, these methods are not mutually exclusive and can offer complementary perspectives on anomaly detection. This paper first highlights the successes and limitations of prediction-based and reconstruction-based methods with visualized time series signals and anomaly scores. We then propose AER (Auto-encoder with Regression), a joint model that combines a vanilla auto-encoder and an LSTM regressor to incorporate the successes and address the limitations of each method. Our model can produce bi-directional predictions while simultaneously reconstructing the original time series by optimizing a joint objective function. Furthermore, we propose several ways of combining the prediction and reconstruction errors through a series of ablation studies. Finally, we compare the performance of the AER architecture against two prediction-based methods and three reconstruction-based methods on 12 well-known univariate time series datasets from NASA, Yahoo, Numenta, and UCR. The results show that AER has the highest averaged F1 score across all datasets (a 23.5% improvement compared to ARIMA) while retaining a runtime similar to its vanilla auto-encoder and regressor components. Our model is available in Orion, an open-source benchmarking tool for time series anomaly detection.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Anomaly DetectionUCR Anomaly ArchiveAverage F10.47Auto-Encoder with Regression (AER)
Anomaly DetectionUCR Anomaly ArchiveAverage F10.391LSTM-DT
Anomaly DetectionUCR Anomaly ArchiveAverage F10.317LSTM-VAE
Anomaly DetectionUCR Anomaly ArchiveAverage F10.314LSTM-AE
Anomaly DetectionUCR Anomaly ArchiveAverage F10.162TadGAN
Anomaly DetectionUCR Anomaly ArchiveAverage F10.124ARIMA

Related Papers

Multi-Stage Prompt Inference Attacks on Enterprise LLM Systems2025-07-21Visual Place Recognition for Large-Scale UAV Applications2025-07-20Language Integration in Fine-Tuning Multimodal Large Language Models for Image-Based Regression2025-07-20Training Transformers with Enforced Lipschitz Constants2025-07-17Disentangling coincident cell events using deep transfer learning and compressive sensing2025-07-17MUPAX: Multidimensional Problem Agnostic eXplainable AI2025-07-173DKeyAD: High-Resolution 3D Point Cloud Anomaly Detection via Keypoint-Guided Point Clustering2025-07-17A Semi-Supervised Learning Method for the Identification of Bad Exposures in Large Imaging Surveys2025-07-17