TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/UniGeo: Unifying Geometry Logical Reasoning via Reformulat...

UniGeo: Unifying Geometry Logical Reasoning via Reformulating Mathematical Expression

Jiaqi Chen, Tong Li, Jinghui Qin, Pan Lu, Liang Lin, Chongyu Chen, Xiaodan Liang

2022-12-06Mathematical ReasoningMathLogical Reasoning
PaperPDFCodeCode(official)

Abstract

Geometry problem solving is a well-recognized testbed for evaluating the high-level multi-modal reasoning capability of deep models. In most existing works, two main geometry problems: calculation and proving, are usually treated as two specific tasks, hindering a deep model to unify its reasoning capability on multiple math tasks. However, in essence, these two tasks have similar problem representations and overlapped math knowledge which can improve the understanding and reasoning ability of a deep model on both two tasks. Therefore, we construct a large-scale Unified Geometry problem benchmark, UniGeo, which contains 4,998 calculation problems and 9,543 proving problems. Each proving problem is annotated with a multi-step proof with reasons and mathematical expressions. The proof can be easily reformulated as a proving sequence that shares the same formats with the annotated program sequence for calculation problems. Naturally, we also present a unified multi-task Geometric Transformer framework, Geoformer, to tackle calculation and proving problems simultaneously in the form of sequence generation, which finally shows the reasoning ability can be improved on both two tasks by unifying formulation. Furthermore, we propose a Mathematical Expression Pretraining (MEP) method that aims to predict the mathematical expressions in the problem solution, thus improving the Geoformer model. Experiments on the UniGeo demonstrate that our proposed Geoformer obtains state-of-the-art performance by outperforming task-specific model NGS with over 5.6% and 3.2% accuracies on calculation and proving problems, respectively.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Mathematical ReasoningPGPS9KCompletion accuracy35.6Geoformer

Related Papers

VAR-MATH: Probing True Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models via Symbolic Multi-Instance Benchmarks2025-07-17QuestA: Expanding Reasoning Capacity in LLMs via Question Augmentation2025-07-17A Survey of Deep Learning for Geometry Problem Solving2025-07-16Scaling Up RL: Unlocking Diverse Reasoning in LLMs via Prolonged Training2025-07-16KisMATH: Do LLMs Have Knowledge of Implicit Structures in Mathematical Reasoning?2025-07-15Temperature and Persona Shape LLM Agent Consensus With Minimal Accuracy Gains in Qualitative Coding2025-07-15Personalized Exercise Recommendation with Semantically-Grounded Knowledge Tracing2025-07-15Reasoning or Memorization? Unreliable Results of Reinforcement Learning Due to Data Contamination2025-07-14