TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Multi-View Reasoning: Consistent Contrastive Learning for ...

Multi-View Reasoning: Consistent Contrastive Learning for Math Word Problem

Wenqi Zhang, Yongliang Shen, Yanna Ma, Xiaoxia Cheng, Zeqi Tan, Qingpeng Nong, Weiming Lu

2022-10-21Mathematical ReasoningMathRelation ExtractionMath Word Problem SolvingContrastive Learning
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

Math word problem solver requires both precise relation reasoning about quantities in the text and reliable generation for the diverse equation. Current sequence-to-tree or relation extraction methods regard this only from a fixed view, struggling to simultaneously handle complex semantics and diverse equations. However, human solving naturally involves two consistent reasoning views: top-down and bottom-up, just as math equations also can be expressed in multiple equivalent forms: pre-order and post-order. We propose a multi-view consistent contrastive learning for a more complete semantics-to-equation mapping. The entire process is decoupled into two independent but consistent views: top-down decomposition and bottom-up construction, and the two reasoning views are aligned in multi-granularity for consistency, enhancing global generation and precise reasoning. Experiments on multiple datasets across two languages show our approach significantly outperforms the existing baselines, especially on complex problems. We also show after consistent alignment, multi-view can absorb the merits of both views and generate more diverse results consistent with the mathematical laws.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Question AnsweringMath23KAccuracy (5-fold)85.2Multi-view* (ours)
Question AnsweringMath23KAccuracy (training-test)87.1Multi-view* (ours)
Question AnsweringMAWPSAccuracy (%)92.3Multi-view
Question AnsweringMathQAAnswer Accuracy80.6Multi-view
Math Word Problem SolvingMath23KAccuracy (5-fold)85.2Multi-view* (ours)
Math Word Problem SolvingMath23KAccuracy (training-test)87.1Multi-view* (ours)
Math Word Problem SolvingMAWPSAccuracy (%)92.3Multi-view
Math Word Problem SolvingMathQAAnswer Accuracy80.6Multi-view
Mathematical Question AnsweringMath23KAccuracy (5-fold)85.2Multi-view* (ours)
Mathematical Question AnsweringMath23KAccuracy (training-test)87.1Multi-view* (ours)
Mathematical Question AnsweringMAWPSAccuracy (%)92.3Multi-view
Mathematical Question AnsweringMathQAAnswer Accuracy80.6Multi-view
Mathematical ReasoningMath23KAccuracy (5-fold)85.2Multi-view* (ours)
Mathematical ReasoningMath23KAccuracy (training-test)87.1Multi-view* (ours)
Mathematical ReasoningMAWPSAccuracy (%)92.3Multi-view
Mathematical ReasoningMathQAAnswer Accuracy80.6Multi-view

Related Papers

VAR-MATH: Probing True Mathematical Reasoning in Large Language Models via Symbolic Multi-Instance Benchmarks2025-07-17QuestA: Expanding Reasoning Capacity in LLMs via Question Augmentation2025-07-17SemCSE: Semantic Contrastive Sentence Embeddings Using LLM-Generated Summaries For Scientific Abstracts2025-07-17HapticCap: A Multimodal Dataset and Task for Understanding User Experience of Vibration Haptic Signals2025-07-17Overview of the TalentCLEF 2025: Skill and Job Title Intelligence for Human Capital Management2025-07-17SGCL: Unifying Self-Supervised and Supervised Learning for Graph Recommendation2025-07-17A Survey of Deep Learning for Geometry Problem Solving2025-07-16Scaling Up RL: Unlocking Diverse Reasoning in LLMs via Prolonged Training2025-07-16