TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Efficient Deep Clustering of Human Activities and How to I...

Efficient Deep Clustering of Human Activities and How to Improve Evaluation

Louis Mahon, Thomas Lukasiewicz

2022-09-17Asian Conference on Machine Learning 2023 1Deep ClusteringImage ClusteringHuman Activity RecognitionClustering
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

There has been much recent research on human activity re\-cog\-ni\-tion (HAR), due to the proliferation of wearable sensors in watches and phones, and the advances of deep learning methods, which avoid the need to manually extract features from raw sensor signals. A significant disadvantage of deep learning applied to HAR is the need for manually labelled training data, which is especially difficult to obtain for HAR datasets. Progress is starting to be made in the unsupervised setting, in the form of deep HAR clustering models, which can assign labels to data without having been given any labels to train on, but there are problems with evaluating deep HAR clustering models, which makes assessing the field and devising new methods difficult. In this paper, we highlight several distinct problems with how deep HAR clustering models are evaluated, describing these problems in detail and conducting careful experiments to explicate the effect that they can have on results. We then discuss solutions to these problems, and suggest standard evaluation settings for future deep HAR clustering models. Additionally, we present a new deep clustering model for HAR. When tested under our proposed settings, our model performs better than (or on par with) existing models, while also being more efficient and better able to scale to more complex datasets by avoiding the need for an autoencoder.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Activity RecognitionPAMAP2ARI0.814Selective HAR Clustering
Activity RecognitionPAMAP2NMI0.884Selective HAR Clustering
Action DetectionPAMAP2ARI0.814Selective HAR Clustering
Action DetectionPAMAP2NMI0.884Selective HAR Clustering
Image ClusteringHARAccuracy0.753Selective HAR Clustering
Image ClusteringHARNMI0.76Selective HAR Clustering
Human Activity RecognitionPAMAP2ARI0.814Selective HAR Clustering
Human Activity RecognitionPAMAP2NMI0.884Selective HAR Clustering

Related Papers

Tri-Learn Graph Fusion Network for Attributed Graph Clustering2025-07-18Ranking Vectors Clustering: Theory and Applications2025-07-16ZKP-FedEval: Verifiable and Privacy-Preserving Federated Evaluation using Zero-Knowledge Proofs2025-07-15Car Object Counting and Position Estimation via Extension of the CLIP-EBC Framework2025-07-11GNN-ViTCap: GNN-Enhanced Multiple Instance Learning with Vision Transformers for Whole Slide Image Classification and Captioning2025-07-09Consistency and Inconsistency in $K$-Means Clustering2025-07-08MC-INR: Efficient Encoding of Multivariate Scientific Simulation Data using Meta-Learning and Clustered Implicit Neural Representations2025-07-03Supercm: Revisiting Clustering for Semi-Supervised Learning2025-06-30