TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Classification of Breast Tumours Based on Histopathology I...

Classification of Breast Tumours Based on Histopathology Images Using Deep Features and Ensemble of Gradient Boosting Methods

Mohammad Reza Abbasniya, Sayed Ali Sheikholeslamzadeh, Hamid Nasiri, Samaneh Emami

2022-09-03Breast Cancer DetectionTransfer Learning
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women worldwide. Early-stage diagnosis of breast cancer can significantly improve the efficiency of treatment. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems are widely adopted in this issue due to their reliability, accuracy and affordability. There are different imaging techniques for a breast cancer diagnosis; one of the most accurate ones is histopathology which is used in this paper. Deep feature transfer learning is used as the main idea of the proposed CAD system's feature extractor. Although 16 different pre-trained networks have been tested in this study, our main focus is on the classification phase. The Inception-ResNet-v2 which has both residual and inception networks profits together has shown the best feature extraction capability in the case of breast cancer histopathology images among all tested CNNs. In the classification phase, the ensemble of CatBoost, XGBoost and LightGBM has provided the best average accuracy. The BreakHis dataset was used to evaluate the proposed method. BreakHis contains 7909 histopathology images (2,480 benign and 5,429 malignant) in four magnification factors. The proposed method's accuracy (IRv2-CXL) using 70% of BreakHis dataset as training data in 40x, 100x, 200x and 400x magnification is 96.82%, 95.84%, 97.01% and 96.15%, respectively. Most studies on automated breast cancer detection have focused on feature extraction, which made us attend to the classification phase. IRv2-CXL has shown better or comparable results in all magnifications due to using the soft voting ensemble method which could combine the advantages of CatBoost, XGBoost and LightGBM together.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
CancerBreakHis1:1 Accuracy96.46IRv2-CXL
Breast Cancer Histology Image ClassificationBreakHis1:1 Accuracy96.46IRv2-CXL

Related Papers

RaMen: Multi-Strategy Multi-Modal Learning for Bundle Construction2025-07-18Disentangling coincident cell events using deep transfer learning and compressive sensing2025-07-17Best Practices for Large-Scale, Pixel-Wise Crop Mapping and Transfer Learning Workflows2025-07-16Robust-Multi-Task Gradient Boosting2025-07-15Calibrated and Robust Foundation Models for Vision-Language and Medical Image Tasks Under Distribution Shift2025-07-12The Bayesian Approach to Continual Learning: An Overview2025-07-11Contrastive and Transfer Learning for Effective Audio Fingerprinting through a Real-World Evaluation Protocol2025-07-08Agent KB: Leveraging Cross-Domain Experience for Agentic Problem Solving2025-07-08