TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/TREE-G: Decision Trees Contesting Graph Neural Networks

TREE-G: Decision Trees Contesting Graph Neural Networks

Maya Bechler-Speicher, Amir Globerson, Ran Gilad-Bachrach

2022-07-06Graph RegressionGraph ClassificationGraph LearningNode Classification
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

When dealing with tabular data, models based on decision trees are a popular choice due to their high accuracy on these data types, their ease of application, and explainability properties. However, when it comes to graph-structured data, it is not clear how to apply them effectively, in a way that incorporates the topological information with the tabular data available on the vertices of the graph. To address this challenge, we introduce TREE-G. TREE-G modifies standard decision trees, by introducing a novel split function that is specialized for graph data. Not only does this split function incorporate the node features and the topological information, but it also uses a novel pointer mechanism that allows split nodes to use information computed in previous splits. Therefore, the split function adapts to the predictive task and the graph at hand. We analyze the theoretical properties of TREE-G and demonstrate its benefits empirically on multiple graph and vertex prediction benchmarks. In these experiments, TREE-G consistently outperforms other tree-based models and often outperforms other graph-learning algorithms such as Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and Graph Kernels, sometimes by large margins. Moreover, TREE-Gs models and their predictions can be explained and visualized

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Graph ClassificationMutagenicityAccuracy83TREE-G
Graph ClassificationPROTEINSAccuracy75.6TREE-G
Graph ClassificationHIV datasetAccuracy83.5TREE-G
Graph ClassificationENZYMESAccuracy59.6TREE-G
Node ClassificationCiteseerAccuracy74.5TREE-G
Node ClassificationCora: fixed 20 node per classAccuracy83.5TREE-G
Node ClassificationPubmedAccuracy78TREE-G
ClassificationMutagenicityAccuracy83TREE-G
ClassificationPROTEINSAccuracy75.6TREE-G
ClassificationHIV datasetAccuracy83.5TREE-G
ClassificationENZYMESAccuracy59.6TREE-G

Related Papers

SGCL: Unifying Self-Supervised and Supervised Learning for Graph Recommendation2025-07-17A Graph-in-Graph Learning Framework for Drug-Target Interaction Prediction2025-07-15Graph World Model2025-07-14Federated Learning with Graph-Based Aggregation for Traffic Forecasting2025-07-13Graph Learning2025-07-08GDGB: A Benchmark for Generative Dynamic Text-Attributed Graph Learning2025-07-04S2FGL: Spatial Spectral Federated Graph Learning2025-07-03Interpretable Hierarchical Concept Reasoning through Attention-Guided Graph Learning2025-06-26