TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Unified Negative Pair Generation toward Well-discriminativ...

Unified Negative Pair Generation toward Well-discriminative Feature Space for Face Recognition

Junuk Jung, Seonhoon Lee, Heung-Seon Oh, Yongjun Park, Joochan Park, Sungbin Son

2022-03-22Face RecognitionFace VerificationFace Identification
PaperPDFCodeCode(official)

Abstract

The goal of face recognition (FR) can be viewed as a pair similarity optimization problem, maximizing a similarity set $\mathcal{S}^p$ over positive pairs, while minimizing similarity set $\mathcal{S}^n$ over negative pairs. Ideally, it is expected that FR models form a well-discriminative feature space (WDFS) that satisfies $\inf{\mathcal{S}^p} > \sup{\mathcal{S}^n}$. With regard to WDFS, the existing deep feature learning paradigms (i.e., metric and classification losses) can be expressed as a unified perspective on different pair generation (PG) strategies. Unfortunately, in the metric loss (ML), it is infeasible to generate negative pairs taking all classes into account in each iteration because of the limited mini-batch size. In contrast, in classification loss (CL), it is difficult to generate extremely hard negative pairs owing to the convergence of the class weight vectors to their center. This leads to a mismatch between the two similarity distributions of the sampled pairs and all negative pairs. Thus, this paper proposes a unified negative pair generation (UNPG) by combining two PG strategies (i.e., MLPG and CLPG) from a unified perspective to alleviate the mismatch. UNPG introduces useful information about negative pairs using MLPG to overcome the CLPG deficiency. Moreover, it includes filtering the similarities of noisy negative pairs to guarantee reliable convergence and improved performance. Exhaustive experiments show the superiority of UNPG by achieving state-of-the-art performance across recent loss functions on public benchmark datasets. Our code and pretrained models are publicly available.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Facial Recognition and ModellingIJB-CTAR @ FAR=1e-397.57Cos+UNPG
Facial Recognition and ModellingIJB-CTAR @ FAR=1e-397.51Arc+UNPG
Facial Recognition and ModellingIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.6Arc+UNPG
Facial Recognition and ModellingIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000195.04Arc+UNPG
Facial Recognition and ModellingIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.5Mag+UNPG
Facial Recognition and ModellingIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000195.21Mag+UNPG
Facial Recognition and ModellingIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.5Cos+UNPG
Facial Recognition and ModellingIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000194.99Cos+UNPG
Face VerificationIJB-CTAR @ FAR=1e-397.57Cos+UNPG
Face VerificationIJB-CTAR @ FAR=1e-397.51Arc+UNPG
Face VerificationIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.6Arc+UNPG
Face VerificationIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000195.04Arc+UNPG
Face VerificationIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.5Mag+UNPG
Face VerificationIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000195.21Mag+UNPG
Face VerificationIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.5Cos+UNPG
Face VerificationIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000194.99Cos+UNPG
Face ReconstructionIJB-CTAR @ FAR=1e-397.57Cos+UNPG
Face ReconstructionIJB-CTAR @ FAR=1e-397.51Arc+UNPG
Face ReconstructionIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.6Arc+UNPG
Face ReconstructionIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000195.04Arc+UNPG
Face ReconstructionIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.5Mag+UNPG
Face ReconstructionIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000195.21Mag+UNPG
Face ReconstructionIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.5Cos+UNPG
Face ReconstructionIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000194.99Cos+UNPG
3DIJB-CTAR @ FAR=1e-397.57Cos+UNPG
3DIJB-CTAR @ FAR=1e-397.51Arc+UNPG
3DIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.6Arc+UNPG
3DIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000195.04Arc+UNPG
3DIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.5Mag+UNPG
3DIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000195.21Mag+UNPG
3DIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.5Cos+UNPG
3DIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000194.99Cos+UNPG
3D Face ModellingIJB-CTAR @ FAR=1e-397.57Cos+UNPG
3D Face ModellingIJB-CTAR @ FAR=1e-397.51Arc+UNPG
3D Face ModellingIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.6Arc+UNPG
3D Face ModellingIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000195.04Arc+UNPG
3D Face ModellingIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.5Mag+UNPG
3D Face ModellingIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000195.21Mag+UNPG
3D Face ModellingIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.5Cos+UNPG
3D Face ModellingIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000194.99Cos+UNPG
3D Face ReconstructionIJB-CTAR @ FAR=1e-397.57Cos+UNPG
3D Face ReconstructionIJB-CTAR @ FAR=1e-397.51Arc+UNPG
3D Face ReconstructionIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.6Arc+UNPG
3D Face ReconstructionIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000195.04Arc+UNPG
3D Face ReconstructionIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.5Mag+UNPG
3D Face ReconstructionIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000195.21Mag+UNPG
3D Face ReconstructionIJB-BTAR @ FAR=0.00196.5Cos+UNPG
3D Face ReconstructionIJB-BTAR@FAR=0.000194.99Cos+UNPG

Related Papers

ProxyFusion: Face Feature Aggregation Through Sparse Experts2025-09-24DiffClean: Diffusion-based Makeup Removal for Accurate Age Estimation2025-07-17Non-Adaptive Adversarial Face Generation2025-07-16Attributes Shape the Embedding Space of Face Recognition Models2025-07-15Face mask detection project report.2025-07-02On the Burstiness of Faces in Set2025-06-25Identifying Physically Realizable Triggers for Backdoored Face Recognition Networks2025-06-24SELFI: Selective Fusion of Identity for Generalizable Deepfake Detection2025-06-21