TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Dual Cluster Contrastive learning for Object Re-Identifica...

Dual Cluster Contrastive learning for Object Re-Identification

Hantao Yao, Changsheng Xu

2021-12-09Contrastive LearningPerson Re-Identification
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

Recently, cluster contrastive learning has been proven effective for object ReID by computing the contrastive loss between the individual features and the cluster memory. However, existing methods that use the individual features to momentum update the cluster memory will fluctuate over the training examples, especially for the outlier samples. Unlike the individual-based updating mechanism, the centroid-based updating mechanism that applies the mean feature of each cluster to update the cluster memory can reduce the impact of individual samples. Therefore, we formulate the individual-based updating and centroid-based updating mechanisms in a unified cluster contrastive framework, named Dual Cluster Contrastive framework (DCC), which maintains two types of memory banks: individual and centroid cluster memory banks. Significantly, the individual cluster memory considers just one individual at a time to take a single step for updating. The centroid cluster memory applies the mean feature of each cluster to update the corresponding cluster memory. During optimization, besides the vallina contrastive loss of each memory, a cross-view consistency constraint is applied to exchange the benefits of two memories for generating a discriminative description for the object ReID. Note that DCC can be easily applied for unsupervised or supervised object ReID by using ground-truth labels or the generated pseudo-labels. Extensive experiments on three benchmarks, \emph{e.g.,} Market-1501, MSMT17, and VeRi-776, under \textbf{supervised Object ReID} and \textbf{unsupervised Object ReID} demonstrate the superiority of the proposed DCC.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Person Re-IdentificationMarket-1501Rank-195.4Dual Cluster Contrastive
Person Re-IdentificationMarket-1501Rank-598.5Dual Cluster Contrastive
Person Re-IdentificationMarket-1501mAP89.2Dual Cluster Contrastive

Related Papers

SemCSE: Semantic Contrastive Sentence Embeddings Using LLM-Generated Summaries For Scientific Abstracts2025-07-17HapticCap: A Multimodal Dataset and Task for Understanding User Experience of Vibration Haptic Signals2025-07-17Overview of the TalentCLEF 2025: Skill and Job Title Intelligence for Human Capital Management2025-07-17SGCL: Unifying Self-Supervised and Supervised Learning for Graph Recommendation2025-07-17Weakly Supervised Visible-Infrared Person Re-Identification via Heterogeneous Expert Collaborative Consistency Learning2025-07-17WhoFi: Deep Person Re-Identification via Wi-Fi Channel Signal Encoding2025-07-17Similarity-Guided Diffusion for Contrastive Sequential Recommendation2025-07-16LLM-Driven Dual-Level Multi-Interest Modeling for Recommendation2025-07-15