TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Sample Prior Guided Robust Model Learning to Suppress Nois...

Sample Prior Guided Robust Model Learning to Suppress Noisy Labels

Wenkai Chen, Chuang Zhu, Yi Chen, Mengting Li, Tiejun Huang

2021-12-02Image ClassificationLearning with noisy labels
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

Imperfect labels are ubiquitous in real-world datasets and seriously harm the model performance. Several recent effective methods for handling noisy labels have two key steps: 1) dividing samples into cleanly labeled and wrongly labeled sets by training loss, 2) using semi-supervised methods to generate pseudo-labels for samples in the wrongly labeled set. However, current methods always hurt the informative hard samples due to the similar loss distribution between the hard samples and the noisy ones. In this paper, we proposed PGDF (Prior Guided Denoising Framework), a novel framework to learn a deep model to suppress noise by generating the samples' prior knowledge, which is integrated into both dividing samples step and semi-supervised step. Our framework can save more informative hard clean samples into the cleanly labeled set. Besides, our framework also promotes the quality of pseudo-labels during the semi-supervised step by suppressing the noise in the current pseudo-labels generating scheme. To further enhance the hard samples, we reweight the samples in the cleanly labeled set during training. We evaluated our method using synthetic datasets based on CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100, as well as on the real-world datasets WebVision and Clothing1M. The results demonstrate substantial improvements over state-of-the-art methods.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Image Classificationmini WebVision 1.0ImageNet Top-1 Accuracy75.45PGDF (Inception-ResNet-v2)
Image Classificationmini WebVision 1.0ImageNet Top-5 Accuracy93.11PGDF (Inception-ResNet-v2)
Image Classificationmini WebVision 1.0Top-1 Accuracy81.47PGDF (Inception-ResNet-v2)
Image Classificationmini WebVision 1.0Top-5 Accuracy94.03PGDF (Inception-ResNet-v2)
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-AggregateAccuracy (mean)96.11PGDF
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random1Accuracy (mean)96.01PGDF
Image ClassificationCIFAR-100NAccuracy (mean)74.08PGDF
Image ClassificationCIFAR-10N-WorstAccuracy (mean)93.65PGDF
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-AggregateAccuracy (mean)96.11PGDF
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-Random1Accuracy (mean)96.01PGDF
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-100NAccuracy (mean)74.08PGDF
Document Text ClassificationCIFAR-10N-WorstAccuracy (mean)93.65PGDF

Related Papers

Automatic Classification and Segmentation of Tunnel Cracks Based on Deep Learning and Visual Explanations2025-07-18Adversarial attacks to image classification systems using evolutionary algorithms2025-07-17Efficient Adaptation of Pre-trained Vision Transformer underpinned by Approximately Orthogonal Fine-Tuning Strategy2025-07-17Federated Learning for Commercial Image Sources2025-07-17MUPAX: Multidimensional Problem Agnostic eXplainable AI2025-07-17CLID-MU: Cross-Layer Information Divergence Based Meta Update Strategy for Learning with Noisy Labels2025-07-16Hashed Watermark as a Filter: Defeating Forging and Overwriting Attacks in Weight-based Neural Network Watermarking2025-07-15Transferring Styles for Reduced Texture Bias and Improved Robustness in Semantic Segmentation Networks2025-07-14