TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Volumetric Quantitative Ablation Margins for Assessment of...

Volumetric Quantitative Ablation Margins for Assessment of Ablation Completeness in Thermal Ablation of Liver Tumors

Raluca-Maria Sandu, Iwan Polucci, Simeon J. S. Ruiter, Raphael Sznitman, Koert P. de Jong, Jacob Freedman, Stefan Weber and Pascale Tinguely

2021-03-10Frontiers in Oncology, Cancer Imaging and Image-directed interventions 2021 3Decision Making
PaperPDFCode

Abstract

In thermal ablation of liver tumors, complete coverage of the tumor volume by the ablation volume with a sufficient ablation margin is the most important factor for treatment success. Evaluation of ablation completeness is commonly performed by visual inspection in 2D and is prone to inter-reader variability. This work aimed to introduce a standardized approach for evaluation of ablation completeness after CT-guided thermal ablation of liver tumors, using volumetric quantitative ablation margins (QAM). Methods: A QAM computation metric based on volumetric segmentations of tumor and ablation areas and signed Euclidean surface distance maps was developed, including a novel algorithm to address QAM computation in subcapsular tumors. The code for QAM computation was verified in artificial examples of tumor and ablation spheres simulating varying scenarios of ablation margins. The applicability of the QAM metric was investigated in representative cases extracted from a prospective database of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) treated with stereotactic microwave ablation (SMWA). Results: Applicability of the proposed QAM metric was confirmed in artificial and clinical example cases. Numerical and visual options of data presentation displaying substrata of QAM distributions were proposed. For subcapsular tumors, the underestimation of tumor coverage by the ablation volume when applying an unadjusted QAM method was confirmed, supporting the benefits of using the proposed algorithm for QAM computation in these cases. The computational code for developed QAM was made publicly available, encouraging the use of a standard and objective metric in reporting ablation completeness and margins. Conclusion: The proposed volumetric approach for QAM computation including a novel algorithm to address subcapsular liver tumors enables precision and reproducibility in the assessment of ablation margins. The quantitative feedback on ablation completeness opens possibilities for intra-operative decision making and for refined analyses on predictability and consistency of local tumor control after thermal ablation of liver tumors

Related Papers

Graph-Structured Data Analysis of Component Failure in Autonomous Cargo Ships Based on Feature Fusion2025-07-18Higher-Order Pattern Unification Modulo Similarity Relations2025-07-17Exploiting Constraint Reasoning to Build Graphical Explanations for Mixed-Integer Linear Programming2025-07-17Acting and Planning with Hierarchical Operational Models on a Mobile Robot: A Study with RAE+UPOM2025-07-15CogDDN: A Cognitive Demand-Driven Navigation with Decision Optimization and Dual-Process Thinking2025-07-15Detección y Cuantificación de Erosión Fluvial con Visión Artificial2025-07-15Guiding LLM Decision-Making with Fairness Reward Models2025-07-15Turning Sand to Gold: Recycling Data to Bridge On-Policy and Off-Policy Learning via Causal Bound2025-07-15