TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/TS-LSTM and Temporal-Inception: Exploiting Spatiotemporal ...

TS-LSTM and Temporal-Inception: Exploiting Spatiotemporal Dynamics for Activity Recognition

Chih-Yao Ma, Min-Hung Chen, Zsolt Kira, Ghassan AlRegib

2017-03-30Action ClassificationVideo ClassificationVideo UnderstandingAction RecognitionTemporal Action LocalizationActivity Recognition
PaperPDFCode(official)CodeCodeCode

Abstract

Recent two-stream deep Convolutional Neural Networks (ConvNets) have made significant progress in recognizing human actions in videos. Despite their success, methods extending the basic two-stream ConvNet have not systematically explored possible network architectures to further exploit spatiotemporal dynamics within video sequences. Further, such networks often use different baseline two-stream networks. Therefore, the differences and the distinguishing factors between various methods using Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) or convolutional networks on temporally-constructed feature vectors (Temporal-ConvNet) are unclear. In this work, we first demonstrate a strong baseline two-stream ConvNet using ResNet-101. We use this baseline to thoroughly examine the use of both RNNs and Temporal-ConvNets for extracting spatiotemporal information. Building upon our experimental results, we then propose and investigate two different networks to further integrate spatiotemporal information: 1) temporal segment RNN and 2) Inception-style Temporal-ConvNet. We demonstrate that using both RNNs (using LSTMs) and Temporal-ConvNets on spatiotemporal feature matrices are able to exploit spatiotemporal dynamics to improve the overall performance. However, each of these methods require proper care to achieve state-of-the-art performance; for example, LSTMs require pre-segmented data or else they cannot fully exploit temporal information. Our analysis identifies specific limitations for each method that could form the basis of future work. Our experimental results on UCF101 and HMDB51 datasets achieve state-of-the-art performances, 94.1% and 69.0%, respectively, without requiring extensive temporal augmentation.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Activity RecognitionHMDB-51Average accuracy of 3 splits69TS-LSTM
Activity RecognitionUCF1013-fold Accuracy94.1TS-LSTM
Action RecognitionHMDB-51Average accuracy of 3 splits69TS-LSTM
Action RecognitionUCF1013-fold Accuracy94.1TS-LSTM

Related Papers

VideoITG: Multimodal Video Understanding with Instructed Temporal Grounding2025-07-17A Real-Time System for Egocentric Hand-Object Interaction Detection in Industrial Domains2025-07-17DVFL-Net: A Lightweight Distilled Video Focal Modulation Network for Spatio-Temporal Action Recognition2025-07-16UGC-VideoCaptioner: An Omni UGC Video Detail Caption Model and New Benchmarks2025-07-15ZKP-FedEval: Verifiable and Privacy-Preserving Federated Evaluation using Zero-Knowledge Proofs2025-07-15EmbRACE-3K: Embodied Reasoning and Action in Complex Environments2025-07-14Chat with AI: The Surprising Turn of Real-time Video Communication from Human to AI2025-07-14Beyond Appearance: Geometric Cues for Robust Video Instance Segmentation2025-07-08