TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Group-aware Contrastive Regression for Action Quality Asse...

Group-aware Contrastive Regression for Action Quality Assessment

Xumin Yu, Yongming Rao, Wenliang Zhao, Jiwen Lu, Jie zhou

2021-08-17ICCV 2021 10regressionAction Quality Assessment
PaperPDFCode

Abstract

Assessing action quality is challenging due to the subtle differences between videos and large variations in scores. Most existing approaches tackle this problem by regressing a quality score from a single video, suffering a lot from the large inter-video score variations. In this paper, we show that the relations among videos can provide important clues for more accurate action quality assessment during both training and inference. Specifically, we reformulate the problem of action quality assessment as regressing the relative scores with reference to another video that has shared attributes (e.g., category and difficulty), instead of learning unreferenced scores. Following this formulation, we propose a new Contrastive Regression (CoRe) framework to learn the relative scores by pair-wise comparison, which highlights the differences between videos and guides the models to learn the key hints for assessment. In order to further exploit the relative information between two videos, we devise a group-aware regression tree to convert the conventional score regression into two easier sub-problems: coarse-to-fine classification and regression in small intervals. To demonstrate the effectiveness of CoRe, we conduct extensive experiments on three mainstream AQA datasets including AQA-7, MTL-AQA and JIGSAWS. Our approach outperforms previous methods by a large margin and establishes new state-of-the-art on all three benchmarks.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Action Quality AssessmentMTL-AQARL2(*100)0.26CoRe(w/ DD)
Action Quality AssessmentMTL-AQASpearman Correlation95.12CoRe(w/ DD)
Action Quality AssessmentMTL-AQARL2(*100)0.394I3D+MLP(w/ DD)
Action Quality AssessmentMTL-AQASpearman Correlation93.81I3D+MLP(w/ DD)
Action Quality AssessmentMTL-AQARL2(*100)0.365CoRe
Action Quality AssessmentMTL-AQASpearman Correlation93.41CoRe
Action Quality AssessmentMTL-AQARL2(*100)0.465I3D+MLP
Action Quality AssessmentMTL-AQASpearman Correlation91.96I3D+MLP
Action Quality AssessmentAQA-7RL2(*100)2.12CoRe
Action Quality AssessmentAQA-7RL2(*100)3.2I3D+MLP

Related Papers

Language Integration in Fine-Tuning Multimodal Large Language Models for Image-Based Regression2025-07-20Neural Network-Guided Symbolic Regression for Interpretable Descriptor Discovery in Perovskite Catalysts2025-07-16Imbalanced Regression Pipeline Recommendation2025-07-16Second-Order Bounds for [0,1]-Valued Regression via Betting Loss2025-07-16Sparse Regression Codes exploit Multi-User Diversity without CSI2025-07-15Bradley-Terry and Multi-Objective Reward Modeling Are Complementary2025-07-10Active Learning for Manifold Gaussian Process Regression2025-06-26A Survey of Predictive Maintenance Methods: An Analysis of Prognostics via Classification and Regression2025-06-25