TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Unsupervised Deep Anomaly Detection for Multi-Sensor Time-...

Unsupervised Deep Anomaly Detection for Multi-Sensor Time-Series Signals

Yuxin Zhang, Yiqiang Chen, Jindong Wang, Zhiwen Pan

2021-07-27Unsupervised Anomaly DetectionHuman Activity RecognitionAnomaly DetectionTime SeriesTime Series AnalysisActivity Recognition
PaperPDF

Abstract

Nowadays, multi-sensor technologies are applied in many fields, e.g., Health Care (HC), Human Activity Recognition (HAR), and Industrial Control System (ICS). These sensors can generate a substantial amount of multivariate time-series data. Unsupervised anomaly detection on multi-sensor time-series data has been proven critical in machine learning researches. The key challenge is to discover generalized normal patterns by capturing spatial-temporal correlation in multi-sensor data. Beyond this challenge, the noisy data is often intertwined with the training data, which is likely to mislead the model by making it hard to distinguish between the normal, abnormal, and noisy data. Few of previous researches can jointly address these two challenges. In this paper, we propose a novel deep learning-based anomaly detection algorithm called Deep Convolutional Autoencoding Memory network (CAE-M). We first build a Deep Convolutional Autoencoder to characterize spatial dependence of multi-sensor data with a Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) to better distinguish between the noisy, normal, and abnormal data. Then, we construct a Memory Network consisting of linear (Autoregressive Model) and non-linear predictions (Bidirectional LSTM with Attention) to capture temporal dependence from time-series data. Finally, CAE-M jointly optimizes these two subnetworks. We empirically compare the proposed approach with several state-of-the-art anomaly detection methods on HAR and HC datasets. Experimental results demonstrate that our proposed model outperforms these existing methods.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Anomaly DetectionSMAPAUC99.01CAE-M
Anomaly DetectionSMAPF188.27CAE-M
Anomaly DetectionSMAPPrecision81.93CAE-M
Anomaly DetectionSMAPRecall95.67CAE-M
Unsupervised Anomaly DetectionSMAPAUC99.01CAE-M
Unsupervised Anomaly DetectionSMAPF188.27CAE-M
Unsupervised Anomaly DetectionSMAPPrecision81.93CAE-M
Unsupervised Anomaly DetectionSMAPRecall95.67CAE-M

Related Papers

Multi-Stage Prompt Inference Attacks on Enterprise LLM Systems2025-07-213DKeyAD: High-Resolution 3D Point Cloud Anomaly Detection via Keypoint-Guided Point Clustering2025-07-17A Semi-Supervised Learning Method for the Identification of Bad Exposures in Large Imaging Surveys2025-07-17MoTM: Towards a Foundation Model for Time Series Imputation based on Continuous Modeling2025-07-17The Power of Architecture: Deep Dive into Transformer Architectures for Long-Term Time Series Forecasting2025-07-17Emergence of Functionally Differentiated Structures via Mutual Information Optimization in Recurrent Neural Networks2025-07-17A Privacy-Preserving Framework for Advertising Personalization Incorporating Federated Learning and Differential Privacy2025-07-16ZKP-FedEval: Verifiable and Privacy-Preserving Federated Evaluation using Zero-Knowledge Proofs2025-07-15