TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/It Takes Two to Tango: Mixup for Deep Metric Learning

It Takes Two to Tango: Mixup for Deep Metric Learning

Shashanka Venkataramanan, Bill Psomas, Ewa Kijak, Laurent Amsaleg, Konstantinos Karantzalos, Yannis Avrithis

2021-06-09ICLR 2022 4Representation LearningMetric LearningData AugmentationVocal Bursts Valence Prediction
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

Metric learning involves learning a discriminative representation such that embeddings of similar classes are encouraged to be close, while embeddings of dissimilar classes are pushed far apart. State-of-the-art methods focus mostly on sophisticated loss functions or mining strategies. On the one hand, metric learning losses consider two or more examples at a time. On the other hand, modern data augmentation methods for classification consider two or more examples at a time. The combination of the two ideas is under-studied. In this work, we aim to bridge this gap and improve representations using mixup, which is a powerful data augmentation approach interpolating two or more examples and corresponding target labels at a time. This task is challenging because unlike classification, the loss functions used in metric learning are not additive over examples, so the idea of interpolating target labels is not straightforward. To the best of our knowledge, we are the first to investigate mixing both examples and target labels for deep metric learning. We develop a generalized formulation that encompasses existing metric learning loss functions and modify it to accommodate for mixup, introducing Metric Mix, or Metrix. We also introduce a new metric - utilization, to demonstrate that by mixing examples during training, we are exploring areas of the embedding space beyond the training classes, thereby improving representations. To validate the effect of improved representations, we show that mixing inputs, intermediate representations or embeddings along with target labels significantly outperforms state-of-the-art metric learning methods on four benchmark deep metric learning datasets.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Metric LearningCARS196R@189.6ResNet-50 + Metrix
Metric Learning CUB-200-2011R@171.4ResNet-50 + Metrix
Metric LearningIn-ShopR@192.2ResNet-50 + Metrix
Metric LearningStanford Online ProductsR@181.3ResNet-50 + Metrix

Related Papers

Touch in the Wild: Learning Fine-Grained Manipulation with a Portable Visuo-Tactile Gripper2025-07-20Spectral Bellman Method: Unifying Representation and Exploration in RL2025-07-17Boosting Team Modeling through Tempo-Relational Representation Learning2025-07-17Unsupervised Ground Metric Learning2025-07-17Overview of the TalentCLEF 2025: Skill and Job Title Intelligence for Human Capital Management2025-07-17Pixel Perfect MegaMed: A Megapixel-Scale Vision-Language Foundation Model for Generating High Resolution Medical Images2025-07-17Similarity-Guided Diffusion for Contrastive Sequential Recommendation2025-07-16Are encoders able to learn landmarkers for warm-starting of Hyperparameter Optimization?2025-07-16