TasksSotADatasetsPapersMethodsSubmitAbout
Papers With Code 2

A community resource for machine learning research: papers, code, benchmarks, and state-of-the-art results.

Explore

Notable BenchmarksAll SotADatasetsPapersMethods

Community

Submit ResultsAbout

Data sourced from the PWC Archive (CC-BY-SA 4.0). Built by the community, for the community.

Papers/Revisiting the Negative Data of Distantly Supervised Relat...

Revisiting the Negative Data of Distantly Supervised Relation Extraction

Chenhao Xie, Jiaqing Liang, Jingping Liu, Chengsong Huang, Wenhao Huang, Yanghua Xiao

2021-05-21ACL 2021 5Relation Extraction
PaperPDFCode(official)

Abstract

Distantly supervision automatically generates plenty of training samples for relation extraction. However, it also incurs two major problems: noisy labels and imbalanced training data. Previous works focus more on reducing wrongly labeled relations (false positives) while few explore the missing relations that are caused by incompleteness of knowledge base (false negatives). Furthermore, the quantity of negative labels overwhelmingly surpasses the positive ones in previous problem formulations. In this paper, we first provide a thorough analysis of the above challenges caused by negative data. Next, we formulate the problem of relation extraction into as a positive unlabeled learning task to alleviate false negative problem. Thirdly, we propose a pipeline approach, dubbed \textsc{ReRe}, that performs sentence-level relation detection then subject/object extraction to achieve sample-efficient training. Experimental results show that the proposed method consistently outperforms existing approaches and remains excellent performance even learned with a large quantity of false positive samples.

Results

TaskDatasetMetricValueModel
Relation ExtractionNYT21F159.62ReRe
Relation ExtractionNYT21F158.88ReRe (exact)
Relation ExtractionNYT21F157.33TPLinker(exact)
Relation ExtractionNYT21F154.78CasRel (exact)
Relation ExtractionNYT11-HRLF156.23RERE
Relation ExtractionNYT11-HRLF155.47ReRe (exact)
Relation ExtractionNYT11-HRLF153.8HRL
Relation ExtractionNYT11-HRLF153.8HRL
Relation ExtractionNYT10-HRLF173.95ReRe
Relation ExtractionNYT10-HRLF173.4ReRe (exact)
Relation ExtractionNYT10-HRLF172.45TPLinker Wang et al. (2020)*
Relation ExtractionNYT10-HRLF171.93TPLinker Wang et al. (2020)*(exact)
Relation ExtractionNYT10-HRLF170.11CasRel (exact)
Relation ExtractionNYT10-HRLF170.11CasRel (exact)
Relation ExtractionNYT10-HRLF164.4HRL Takanobu et al. (2019)
Relation ExtractionSKEF187.21ReRe (exact)
Relation ExtractionSKEF186.45CasRel (exact)
Relation ExtractionSKEF184.32TPLinker (exact)

Related Papers

DocIE@XLLM25: In-Context Learning for Information Extraction using Fully Synthetic Demonstrations2025-07-08Multiple Streams of Relation Extraction: Enriching and Recalling in Transformers2025-06-25Chaining Event Spans for Temporal Relation Grounding2025-06-17Summarization for Generative Relation Extraction in the Microbiome Domain2025-06-10Conservative Bias in Large Language Models: Measuring Relation Predictions2025-06-09Comparative Analysis of AI Agent Architectures for Entity Relationship Classification2025-06-03CREFT: Sequential Multi-Agent LLM for Character Relation Extraction2025-05-30Generating Diverse Training Samples for Relation Extraction with Large Language Models2025-05-29